From a distance: Implications of spontaneous self-distancing for adaptive self-reflection.
Open accessAbstract
Although recent experimental work indicates that self-distancing facilitates adaptive self-reflection, it remains unclear (a) whether spontaneous self-distancing leads to similar adaptive outcomes, (b) how spontaneous self-distancing relates to avoidance, and (c) how this strategy impacts interpersonal behavior. Three studies examined these issues demonstrating that the more participants spontaneously self-distanced while reflecting on negative memories, the less emotional (Studies 1-3) and cardiovascular (Study 2) reactivity they displayed in the short term. Spontaneous self-distancing was also associated with lower emotional reactivity and intrusive ideation over time (Study 1). The negative association between spontaneous self-distancing and emotional reactivity was mediated by how participants construed their experience (i.e., less recounting relative to reconstruing) rather than avoidance (Studies 1-2). In addition, spontaneous self-distancing was associated with more problem-solving behavior and less reciprocation of negativity during conflicts among couples in ongoing relationships (Study 3). Although spontaneous self-distancing was empirically related to trait rumination, it explained unique variance in predicting key outcomes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Immersion may amplify emotional and behavioral reactivity to internal experience.
“whereas immersion may amplify emotional and behavioral reactivity to internal experience”
From The metacognitive processes of decentering scale: Development and initial validation of trait and state versions (2020) · cites this paper as Ayduk & Kross, 2010
The General Discussion (page unavailable) reports less emotional reactivity with greater self-distancing while reflecting on negative experiences, supporting the emotional part of the claim. Study 3’s Summary and Discussion (page unavailable) reports that people low in self-distancing more strongly reciprocated their partners’ negative behavior. That supports a behavioral association in interpersonal conflicts, but not the broader claim of behavioral reactivity to internal experience generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBrief therapeutic exercises that stimulate a decentred self-perspective reduce negative emotional reactivity towards stressors such as unpleasant memories and negative self-relevant statements.
“Indeed, brief therapeutic exercises that stimulate a decentred self-perspective have been shown to reduce negative emotional reactivity towards stressors like unpleasant memories and negative self-relevant statements.9–13”
From Protocol for a randomised controlled trial investigating an intervention to boost decentering in response to distressing mental experiences during adolescence: the decentering in adolescence study (DECADES) (2022) · cites this paper as [9]
The Abstract reports that directing people to reflect on negative autobiographical experiences from a self-distanced perspective reduced short-term emotional reactivity. The General Discussion reports a similar association for spontaneous self-distancing. Our copy does not establish the claimed effect for negative self-relevant statements, and the paper's own studies examine spontaneous self-distancing rather than brief therapeutic exercises. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDecentering may facilitate equanimity and behavioral choice.
“decentering may facilitate equanimity and behavioral choice (Ayduk & Kross, 2010; Bernstein et al., 2015; Kross & Ayduk, 2017; Kross & Grossmann, 2012; Shoham, Hadash, & Bernstein, 2018; Verduyn, Mechelen, Kross, Chezzi, & Bever, 2012).”
From The metacognitive processes of decentering scale: Development and initial validation of trait and state versions (2020) · cites this paper as Ayduk & Kross, 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 128 · Cited by 347
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Hedges LV Olkin I 1985 Statistical methods for meta-analysis San Diego, CA Academic Press
- Authors
- Ayduk, Ö., & Kross, E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 809-829
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- PMC
- PMC2881638
- OpenAlex
- W1978108946
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 128
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 33.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH069703)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- negative memories, emotional reactivity, cardiovascular reactivity, memory reconstruction, avoidance, rumination, interpersonal conflict, couples, problem-solving behavior
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Conflict, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Self Concept, Psychological Distance, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review