The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development and initial evaluation of an enhanced measure of boundary flexibility for the work and family domains.
Abstract
This manuscript reports the development of a measure of work and family domain boundary flexibility. Building on previous research, we propose an expanded definition of boundary flexibility that includes two components-flexibility-ability and flexibility-willingness-and we develop a measure designed to capture this more comprehensive definition of boundary flexibility. Flexibility-ability is conceptualized as an individual's perception of personal and situational constraints that affect boundary management, and flexibility-willingness is conceptualized as an individual difference variable that captures the motivation to engage in boundary flexing. An additional feature of domain boundaries, permeability, is also examined. Data are presented from two studies. Study 1 (N = 244) describes the development of a multiscale measure that extends current conceptual definitions of boundary flexibility. Study 2 (N = 225) describes the refinement and evaluation of this measure. Confirmatory factor analysis, reliability evidence, interscale correlations, and correlations with important work-family constructs (e.g., domain centrality, work-family conflict) provide initial construct validity evidence for the measure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Work–nonwork boundary management profiles: A person-centered approach
Kossek, E. E., Ruderman, M. N., Braddy, P. W., & Hannum, K. M. (2012) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.04.003 · Cited by 594
Shockley, K. M., Shen, W., DeNunzio, M. M., Arvan, M. L., & Knudsen, E. A. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000246 · Cited by 451
Work–Life Balance: Weighing the Importance of Work–Family and Work–Health Balance
Gragnano, A., Simbula, S., & Miglioretti, M. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17030907 · Cited by 328
Driving it Home: How Workplace Emotional Labor Harms Employee Home Life
Wagner, D. T., Barnes, C. M., & Scott, B. A. (2014) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12044 · Cited by 224
Wepfer, A. G., Allen, T. D., Brauchli, R., Jenny, G. J., & Bauer, G. F. (2018) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-017-9520-y · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Matthews, R. A., & Barnes-Farrell, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 330-346
- ISSN
- 1076-8998 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1307
- OpenAlex
- W2090038054
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and initial evaluation of an enhanced measure of boundary flexibility for the work and family domains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/a0019302
- The paper
- Matthews, R. A., & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (2010). Development and initial evaluation of an enhanced measure of boundary flexibility for the work and family domains. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.