The DOI matches its Crossref record; 125 of the 125 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: A unified theory and a connectionist model.
Abstract
This article proposes a unified framework for understanding creative problem solving, namely, the explicit-implicit interaction theory. This new theory of creative problem solving constitutes an attempt at providing a more unified explanation of relevant phenomena (in part by reinterpreting/integrating various fragmentary existing theories of incubation and insight). The explicit-implicit interaction theory relies mainly on 5 basic principles, namely, (a) the coexistence of and the difference between explicit and implicit knowledge, (b) the simultaneous involvement of implicit and explicit processes in most tasks, (c) the redundant representation of explicit and implicit knowledge, (d) the integration of the results of explicit and implicit processing, and (e) the iterative (and possibly bidirectional) processing. A computational implementation of the theory is developed based on the CLARION cognitive architecture and applied to the simulation of relevant human data. This work represents an initial step in the development of process-based theories of creativity encompassing incubation, insight, and various other related phenomena.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED ARTICLE: The Nature of Creativity
(2006) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10 · Cited by 1,496
RetractedArtificial intelligence: a modern approach
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1577 · Cited by 21,974
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 · Cited by 19,270
Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference
Pearl, J. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803161 · Cited by 11,653
Introduction to the theory of neural computation
(1994) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(94)90014-0 · Cited by 6,401
“Neural” computation of decisions in optimization problems
Hopfield, J. J., & Tank, D. W. (1985) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00339943 · Cited by 6,031
The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory
(2010) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-62209-1 · Cited by 5,994
Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629 · Cited by 5,137
CAUSALITY: MODELS, REASONING AND INFERENCE
Hitchcock, C. (2001) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.1215/00318108-110-4-639 · Cited by 4,741
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5376 · Cited by 4,207
Cited by
40 years of cognitive architectures: core cognitive abilities and practical applications
Kotseruba, I., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-018-9646-y · Cited by 539
Investigating the structure of semantic networks in low and high creative persons
Kenett, Y. N., Anaki, D., & Faust, M. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00407 · Cited by 392
Incubation, not sleep, aids problem-solving
Brodt, S., Pöhlchen, D., Täumer, E., Gais, S., & Schönauer, M. (2018) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy155 · Cited by 23
A path to generative artificial selves
Gabora, L., & Bach, J. (2023) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-49011-8_2 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Hélie, S., & Sun, R.
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 994-1024
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2095893740
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 125
- FWCI
- 24.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: A unified theory and a connectionist model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/a0019532
- The paper
- Hélie, S., & Sun, R. (2010). Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: A unified theory and a connectionist model. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019532
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.