Cited by 216Reading and Literacy DevelopmentEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentLiteracy and Educational Practices

Does growth rate in oral reading fluency matter in predicting reading comprehension achievement?

Kim, Young-Suk, Petscher, Yaacov, Schatschneider, Christopher, Foorman, Barbara·2010·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

In this study, we examined the relationship of growth trajectories of oral reading fluency, vocabulary, phonological awareness, letter-naming fluency, and nonsense word reading fluency from 1st grade to 3rd grade with reading comprehension in 1st, 2nd, and 3rd grades. Data from 12,536 children who were followed from kindergarten to 3rd grade longitudinally were used. These children were administered Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills subtests, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Third Edition, and reading comprehension (Stanford Achievement Test, 10th ed.) tasks multiple times in each year. Students' initial status and rate of growth in each predictor within each grade were estimated using individual growth modeling. These estimates were then used as predictors in dominance regression analyses to examine relative contributions that the predictors made to the outcome: reading comprehension. Among the 1st-grade predictors, individual differences in growth rate in oral reading fluency in 1st grade, followed by vocabulary skills and the autoregressive effect of reading comprehension, made the most contribution to reading comprehension in 3rd grade. Among the 2nd- and 3rd-grade predictors, children's initial status in oral reading fluency had the strongest relationships with their reading comprehension skills in 3rd grade.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0019643

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For transparent languages such as Italian, reading speed rather than accuracy is considered a more sensitive index of dyslexia.

    “The increase of reading fluency over time is predictive of reading comprehension (Kim et al., 2010) and, for transparent languages such as Italian, reading speed rather than accuracy, is considered a more sensitive index of dyslexia (Seymour et al., 2003).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, Y.-S., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., & Foorman, B.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2010-08
Volume
102
Issue
3
Pages
652-667
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2086269596
Cited by
216
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
FWCI
20.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
Keywords
oral reading fluency, reading comprehension, growth rate, growth trajectories, vocabulary, phonological awareness, letter naming fluency, early literacy, first grade, third grade, individual differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review