Cited by 79Crime Patterns and InterventionsPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingCriminal Justice and Penology

Cost–benefit analysis of multisystemic therapy with serious and violent juvenile offenders.

Klietz, Stephanie J., Borduin, Charles M., Schaeffer, Cindy M.·2010·Journal of Family Psychology

Abstract

This study investigated the economics of multisystemic therapy (MST) versus individual therapy (IT) using rearrest data from a 13.7-year follow-up (Schaeffer & Borduin, 2005) of a randomized clinical trial with serious juvenile offenders (Borduin et al., 1995). Two types of benefits of MST were evaluated: The value to taxpayers was derived from measures of criminal justice system expenses (e.g., police and sheriff's offices, court processing, jails, community supervision), and the value to crime victims was derived in terms of both tangible (e.g., property damage and loss, health care, police and fire services, lost productivity) and intangible (e.g., pain, suffering, reduced quality of life) losses. Results indicated that the reductions in criminality in the MST versus IT conditions were associated with substantial reductions in expenses to taxpayers and intangible losses to crime victims, with cumulative benefits ranging from $75,110 to $199,374 per MST participant. Stated differently, it was estimated that every dollar spent on MST provides $9.51 to $23.59 in savings to taxpayers and crime victims in the years ahead. The economic benefits of MST, as well as its clinical effectiveness, should be considered by policymakers and the public at large in the selection of interventions for serious juvenile offenders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0020838

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 79

Authors
Klietz, S. J., Borduin, C. M., & Schaeffer, C. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
Journal of Family Psychology
Published
2010
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
657-666
ISSN
  • 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1293
OpenAlex
W2140781112
Cited by
79
References
57
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 3
FWCI
25.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
multisystemic therapy, serious juvenile offenders, violent juvenile offenders, cost-benefit analysis, individual psychotherapy, rearrest rates, economic evaluation of interventions, juvenile delinquency treatment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Behavior Therapy, Child, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Crime, Family Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Juvenile Delinquency, Male, Psychotherapy, Violence, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review