Cited by 49Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDigital Mental Health InterventionsStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Psychosocial outcomes of telephone-based counseling for adults with an acquired physical disability: A meta-analysis.

Dorstyn, D. S., Mathias, J. L., Denson, L. A.·2011·Rehabilitation Psychology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The delivery of mental health services by telephone, referred to as telecounseling, has the potential to improve the health outcomes of adults with an acquired physical disability in a cost-effective way. However, the efficacy of this form of treatment requires further evaluation before it is used on a larger scale. AIM: This meta-analysis provides a critical and quantitative evaluation of the impact of telephone-administered psychological interventions on the psychosocial functioning of adults with an acquired physical disability caused by spinal cord injury, limb amputation, severe burn injury, stroke, or multiple sclerosis. METHOD: A comprehensive search of eight electronic databases identified eight studies (N = 658 participants) that compared treatment efficacy to that of matched control groups. Differences in the psychosocial outcomes of treatment and control participants were examined using Cohen's d effect sizes. Fail-safe Ns and 95% confidence intervals were used to evaluate the significance of these results. RESULTS: Significant improvements in coping skills and strategies (overall d = 0.57), community integration (overall d = 0.45), and depression (overall d = 0.44) were observed immediately after telecounseling, with modest improvements in quality of life maintained at 12 months post-intervention (overall d = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that telecounseling is an effective treatment modality for adults adjusting to a physical disability; however, further trials are needed to establish the long term psychosocial benefits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0022249

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Synchronous telehealthcare, such as video-conferencing, was suitable for delivery of some rehabilitation techniques after stroke and spinal cord injury.

    “Synchronous telehealthcare, such as video-conferencing, was suitable for the delivery of some rehabilitation techniques after stroke and spinal cord injury [75], [84].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 96 · Cited by 49

Authors
Dorstyn, D. S., Mathias, J. L., & Denson, L. A.
Affiliations
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Venue
Rehabilitation Psychology
Published
2011-02
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 0090-5550 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1544
OpenAlex
W2018816554
Cited by
49
References
96
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Rehabilitation Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
telehealth counseling, acquired physical disability, psychosocial outcomes, coping strategies, social reintegration, depression, quality of life, spinal cord injury, amputation, burns, stroke, multiple sclerosis
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Amputation, Surgical, Burns, Counseling, Depression, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Quality of Life, Social Adjustment, Spinal Cord Injuries, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Remote Consultation, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review