Psychosocial outcomes of telephone-based counseling for adults with an acquired physical disability: A meta-analysis.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The delivery of mental health services by telephone, referred to as telecounseling, has the potential to improve the health outcomes of adults with an acquired physical disability in a cost-effective way. However, the efficacy of this form of treatment requires further evaluation before it is used on a larger scale. AIM: This meta-analysis provides a critical and quantitative evaluation of the impact of telephone-administered psychological interventions on the psychosocial functioning of adults with an acquired physical disability caused by spinal cord injury, limb amputation, severe burn injury, stroke, or multiple sclerosis. METHOD: A comprehensive search of eight electronic databases identified eight studies (N = 658 participants) that compared treatment efficacy to that of matched control groups. Differences in the psychosocial outcomes of treatment and control participants were examined using Cohen's d effect sizes. Fail-safe Ns and 95% confidence intervals were used to evaluate the significance of these results. RESULTS: Significant improvements in coping skills and strategies (overall d = 0.57), community integration (overall d = 0.45), and depression (overall d = 0.44) were observed immediately after telecounseling, with modest improvements in quality of life maintained at 12 months post-intervention (overall d = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that telecounseling is an effective treatment modality for adults adjusting to a physical disability; however, further trials are needed to establish the long term psychosocial benefits.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Synchronous telehealthcare, such as video-conferencing, was suitable for delivery of some rehabilitation techniques after stroke and spinal cord injury.
“Synchronous telehealthcare, such as video-conferencing, was suitable for the delivery of some rehabilitation techniques after stroke and spinal cord injury [75], [84].”
From The Impact of Telehealthcare on the Quality and Safety of Care: A Systematic Overview (2013) · cites this paper as [84]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 96 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- Dorstyn, D. S., Mathias, J. L., & Denson, L. A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- Venue
- Rehabilitation Psychology
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 0090-5550 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1544
- OpenAlex
- W2018816554
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 96
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Rehabilitation Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Keywords
- telehealth counseling, acquired physical disability, psychosocial outcomes, coping strategies, social reintegration, depression, quality of life, spinal cord injury, amputation, burns, stroke, multiple sclerosis
- MeSH terms
- Stroke Rehabilitation, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Amputation, Surgical, Burns, Counseling, Depression, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Quality of Life, Social Adjustment, Spinal Cord Injuries, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Remote Consultation, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review