Cited by 90Social and Intergroup PsychologyAttachment and Relationship DynamicsSocial Power and Status Dynamics

System justification and the defense of committed relationship ideology.

Day, Martin V., Kay, Aaron C., Holmes, John G., Napier, Jaime L.·2011·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

A consequential ideology in Western society is the uncontested belief that a committed relationship is the most important adult relationship and that almost all people want to marry or seriously couple (DePaulo & Morris, 2005). In the present article, we investigated the extent to which the system justification motive may contribute to the adoption of this ideology. In Studies 1 and 2, we examined whether a heightened motive to maintain the status quo would increase defense of committed relationship values. In Study 3, we examined the reverse association, that is, whether a threat to committed relationship ideology would also affect sociopolitical system endorsement. As past research has found that the justification of political systems depends upon how much these systems are perceived as controlling, in Study 4 we tested whether the defense of the system of committed relationships would also increase when framed as controlling. Results from Studies 1-4 were consistent with our hypotheses, but only for men. In Study 5, using cross-cultural data, we sought to replicate these findings correlationally and probe for a cause of the gender effect. Results from more than 33,000 respondents indicated a relationship (for men) between defense of the sociopolitical system and defense of marriage in countries where the traditional advantages of men over women were most threatened. In Studies 6 and 7, we investigated when this gender difference disappears. Results revealed that when we measured (Study 6) or manipulated (Study 7) personal relationship identity rather than relationship ideology, effects also emerge for women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0023197

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Values, some measures show females score higher, including benevolence, tradition, universalism, and marriage defense.

    “there are some measures in which females score higher (benevolence, tradition, universalism, marriage defense; Day et al., 2011; Schwartz & Rubel-Lifschitz, 2009)”

    From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Day et al., 2011

  • Another study indicated that females' higher levels of marriage defense may be smaller in countries with higher living conditions.

    “The other study (Day et al., 2011) indicated that females’ higher levels of marriage defense may be smaller in countries with higher living conditions.”

    From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Day et al., 2011

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 90

Authors
Day, M. V., Kay, A. C., Holmes, J. G., & Napier, J. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2011
Volume
101
Issue
2
Pages
291-306
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2091137776
Cited by
90
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
19.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWSpace (University of Waterloo) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
system justification, marriage ideology, status quo maintenance, sociopolitical ideology, gender differences, cross-cultural replication, perceived control, gender inequality
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Marriage, Motivation, Psychological Tests, Sex Factors, Social Identification, Social Values, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review