CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 148Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rumination partially mediates the associations between perceived ethnic discrimination, emotional distress, and aggression

Borders, Ashley, Liang, Christopher T. H.·2011·Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology
DOI 10.1037/a0023357
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Research suggests that perceived ethnic discrimination is associated with poor psychological and physiological health. Rumination, or perseverative thoughts about negative experiences, may constitute a maladaptive coping strategy that mediates the associations between perceived discrimination, emotional distress, and aggression. Our sample consisted of 170 ethnic minority and 134 White American participants. For ethnic minority participants, we found a pattern of correlations consistent with rumination partially mediating a causal link between perceived discrimination and depressive symptoms, hostility, anger, and aggression. In White participants, by contrast, the significant associations between perceived discrimination and these indices of emotional and behavioral distress were not statistically mediated by rumination. We discuss possible theoretical and clinical implications of these results.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0023357

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 78 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–148 of 148

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Borders, A., & Liang, C. T. H.
Affiliations
  • The College of New Jersey (US)
  • University of La Verne (US)
ORCID
Venue
Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2011-04
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
125-133
ISSN
  • 1077-341X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0106
  • 1099-9809
DOI
10.1037/a0023357
OpenAlex
W2020515399
Cited by
147
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
22.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
rumination, perceived ethnic discrimination, emotional distress, aggression, hostility, anger, depressive symptoms, ethnic minorities, coping strategies, mediation, racial discrimination
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Anger, Depression, Ethnicity, Female, Hostility, Humans, Male, Perception, Prejudice, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Social Perception, Stress, Psychological, Thinking, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review