Psychosocial resources, threat, and the perception of distance and height: Support for the resources and perception model.
Abstract
Threatening things are often perceptually exaggerated, such that they appear higher, closer, of greater duration, or more intense than they actually are. According to the Resources and Perception Model (RPM) psychosocial resources can prevent this exaggeration, leading to more accurate perception. Two studies tested RPM. Study 1 showed that the perceived closeness of a threatening object (a live tarantula) but not an innocuous object (a cat toy) was moderated by induced self-worth. Further, the more self-worth that participants experienced, the less close the tarantula appeared to them. Study 2 showed that greater levels of self-esteem reduced perceived height, but only among participants prevented from holding a protective handrail while looking down. Together, these studies confirm that resources moderate the physical perception of both distance and height, that resources moderate perception of threats but not nonthreats, that different resources have similar moderating effects, and that psychosocial resources can supplant physical resources.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 59 · Cited by 75
- Authors
- Harber, K. D., Yeung, D., & Iacovelli, A.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- RAND Corporation (US)
- Hofstra University (US)
- Venue
- Emotion
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1080-1090
- ISSN
- 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-1516
- OpenAlex
- W2003170869
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Emotion (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0730985)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Keywords
- psychosocial resources, threat perception, perceived distance, self-worth, self-esteem
- MeSH terms
- Arousal, Distance Perception, Fear, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Models, Psychological, Photic Stimulation, Self Concept, Sex Factors, Size Perception, Social Support, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review