Effects of multisystemic therapy through midlife: A 21.9-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial with serious and violent juvenile offenders.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Although current evidence suggests that the positive effects of multisystemic therapy (MST) on serious crime reach as far as young adulthood, the longer term impact of MST on criminal and noncriminal outcomes in midlife has not been evaluated. In the present study, the authors examined a broad range of criminal and civil court outcomes for serious and violent juvenile offenders who participated on average 21.9 (range = 18.3-23.8) years earlier in a clinical trial of MST (C. M. Borduin et al., 1995). METHOD: Participants were 176 individuals who were originally randomized to MST or individual therapy (IT) during adolescence and averaged 3.9 arrests for felonies prior to treatment. Arrest, incarceration, and civil suit data were obtained in middle adulthood when participants were on average 37.3 years old. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analyses showed that felony recidivism rates were significantly lower for MST participants than for IT participants (34.8% vs. 54.8%, respectively) and that the frequency of misdemeanor offending was 5.0 times lower for MST participants. In addition, the odds of involvement in family-related civil suits during adulthood were twice as high for IT participants as for MST participants. CONCLUSIONS: The present study represents the longest follow-up to date of an MST clinical trial and demonstrates that the positive impact of an evidence-based youth treatment such as MST can last well into adulthood. Implications of the authors' findings for policymakers and service providers are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MST is a well-defined intervention with numerous rigorous evaluations demonstrating immediate and long-term effectiveness.
“it is a well-defined intervention with numerous rigorous evaluations demonstrating immediate and long-term effectiveness [33, 35].”
From Translating economic evaluations into financing strategies for implementing evidence-based practices (2021) · cites this paper as [35]
MST addresses a key public health need (youth recidivism).
“MST addresses a key public health need (youth recidivism)”
From Translating economic evaluations into financing strategies for implementing evidence-based practices (2021) · cites this paper as [35]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 197
- Authors
- Sawyer, A. M., & Borduin, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- ORCID
- Borduin, Charles M.
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 643-652
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- OpenAlex
- W2124789987
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 58.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Missouri Department of Social Services
- University of Missouri
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Keywords
- multisystemic therapy, juvenile offenders, violent juvenile offenders, long-term outcomes, midlife, offending, incarceration
- MeSH terms
- Workforce, Adult, Crime, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Juvenile Delinquency, Male, Psychotherapy, Severity of Illness Index, Social Behavior Disorders, Time Factors, Violence, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review