Cited by 197Crime Patterns and InterventionsPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis

Effects of multisystemic therapy through midlife: A 21.9-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial with serious and violent juvenile offenders.

Sawyer, Aaron M., Borduin, Charles M.·2011·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although current evidence suggests that the positive effects of multisystemic therapy (MST) on serious crime reach as far as young adulthood, the longer term impact of MST on criminal and noncriminal outcomes in midlife has not been evaluated. In the present study, the authors examined a broad range of criminal and civil court outcomes for serious and violent juvenile offenders who participated on average 21.9 (range = 18.3-23.8) years earlier in a clinical trial of MST (C. M. Borduin et al., 1995). METHOD: Participants were 176 individuals who were originally randomized to MST or individual therapy (IT) during adolescence and averaged 3.9 arrests for felonies prior to treatment. Arrest, incarceration, and civil suit data were obtained in middle adulthood when participants were on average 37.3 years old. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analyses showed that felony recidivism rates were significantly lower for MST participants than for IT participants (34.8% vs. 54.8%, respectively) and that the frequency of misdemeanor offending was 5.0 times lower for MST participants. In addition, the odds of involvement in family-related civil suits during adulthood were twice as high for IT participants as for MST participants. CONCLUSIONS: The present study represents the longest follow-up to date of an MST clinical trial and demonstrates that the positive impact of an evidence-based youth treatment such as MST can last well into adulthood. Implications of the authors' findings for policymakers and service providers are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0024862

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 197

Authors
Sawyer, A. M., & Borduin, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2011-10
Volume
79
Issue
5
Pages
643-652
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2124789987
Cited by
197
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 10
FWCI
58.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Missouri Department of Social Services
  • University of Missouri
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Keywords
multisystemic therapy, juvenile offenders, violent juvenile offenders, long-term outcomes, midlife, offending, incarceration
MeSH terms
Workforce, Adult, Crime, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Juvenile Delinquency, Male, Psychotherapy, Severity of Illness Index, Social Behavior Disorders, Time Factors, Violence, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review