The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sex influence on face recognition memory moderated by presentation duration and reencoding.
Abstract
Objective It has been suggested that women have a better face recognition memory than men. Here we analyzed whether this advantage depends on a better encoding or consolidation of information and if the advantage is visible during short-term memory (STM), only, or whether it also remains evident in long-term memory (LTM). Method We tested short- and long-term face recognition memory in 36 nonclinical participants (19 women). We varied the duration of item presentation (1, 5, and 10 s), the time of testing (immediately after the study phase, 1 hr, and 24 hr later), and the possibility to reencode items (none, immediately after the study phase, after 1 hr). Results Women showed better overall face recognition memory than men (ηp² = .15, p Duration ηp² = .16, p Conclusions Our results suggest women do not have a better face recognition memory than men per se, but may profit more than men from longer durations of presentation during encoding or the possibility for reencoding. Future research on sex differences in face recognition memory should explicate possible causes for the better encoding of face information in women.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous human studies using the face recognition paradigm propose that women are better than men at encoding information, rather than having better face recognition memory as such.
“Previous human studies using the face recognition paradigm, propose that women are better than men at encoding information, rather than having better face recognition memory as such [39].”
From Effects of sex and gonadectomy on social investigation and social recognition in mice (2015) · cites this paper as [39]
Citations
Cites
The Neurobiology of Consolidations, Or, How Stable is the Engram?
Dudai, Y. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142050 · Cited by 1,671
A single standard for memory: The case for reconsolidation
Nader, K., & Hardt, O. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2590 · Cited by 811
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What did you do yesterday? A meta-analysis of sex differences in episodic memory.
Asperholm, M., Högman, N., Rafi, J., & Herlitz, A. (2019) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000197 · Cited by 182
Effects of sex and gonadectomy on social investigation and social recognition in mice
Karlsson, S. A., Haziri, K., Hansson, E., Kettunen, P., & Westberg, L. (2015) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/s12868-015-0221-z · Cited by 72
“Previous human studies using the face recognition paradigm, propose that women are better than men at encoding information, rather than having better face recognition memory as such [39].”
Result
Metadata
- Authors
- Weirich, S., Hoffmann, F., Meißner, L., Heinz, A., & Bengner, T.
- Affiliations
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- Anna Freud Centre (GB)
- University of Bremen (DE)
- Stiftung Charité (DE)
- Venue
- Neuropsychology
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 806-813
- ISSN
- 0894-4105 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-1559
- OpenAlex
- W2001989802
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- face memory, sex differences, presentation duration, short-term memory, long-term memory, memory consolidation, encoding, women
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Discrimination, Psychological, Face, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Sex Characteristics, Time Factors, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review