Cited by 17Face Recognition and PerceptionMemory Processes and InfluencesEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sex influence on face recognition memory moderated by presentation duration and reencoding.

Abstract

Objective It has been suggested that women have a better face recognition memory than men. Here we analyzed whether this advantage depends on a better encoding or consolidation of information and if the advantage is visible during short-term memory (STM), only, or whether it also remains evident in long-term memory (LTM). Method We tested short- and long-term face recognition memory in 36 nonclinical participants (19 women). We varied the duration of item presentation (1, 5, and 10 s), the time of testing (immediately after the study phase, 1 hr, and 24 hr later), and the possibility to reencode items (none, immediately after the study phase, after 1 hr). Results Women showed better overall face recognition memory than men (ηp² = .15, p Duration ηp² = .16, p Conclusions Our results suggest women do not have a better face recognition memory than men per se, but may profit more than men from longer durations of presentation during encoding or the possibility for reencoding. Future research on sex differences in face recognition memory should explicate possible causes for the better encoding of face information in women.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0025633

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous human studies using the face recognition paradigm propose that women are better than men at encoding information, rather than having better face recognition memory as such.

    “Previous human studies using the face recognition paradigm, propose that women are better than men at encoding information, rather than having better face recognition memory as such [39].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Weirich, S., Hoffmann, F., Meißner, L., Heinz, A., & Bengner, T.
Affiliations
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Anna Freud Centre (GB)
  • University of Bremen (DE)
  • Stiftung Charité (DE)
Venue
Neuropsychology
Published
2011-11
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
806-813
ISSN
  • 0894-4105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1559
OpenAlex
W2001989802
Cited by
17
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
face memory, sex differences, presentation duration, short-term memory, long-term memory, memory consolidation, encoding, women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Discrimination, Psychological, Face, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Sex Characteristics, Time Factors, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review