Cited by 229Reading and Literacy DevelopmentSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLiteracy and Educational Practices

Reader–text interactions: How differential text and question types influence cognitive skills needed for reading comprehension.

Open access
Eason, Sarah H., Goldberg, Lindsay F., Young, Katherine M., Geist, Megan C., Cutting, Laurie E.·2012·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

Current research has shown that comprehension can vary based on text and question types, and that readers' word recognition and background knowledge may account for these differences. Other reader characteristics such as semantic and syntactic awareness, inferencing, planning/organizing have also all been linked to reading comprehension, but have not been examined with regard to specific text and question types. The aim of this study was to explore the relationships between reader characteristics, text types, and question types, in children aged 10-14. We sought to compare children's performance when comprehending narrative, expository, and functional text, as well as to explore differences between children's performance on comprehension questions that assess their literal or inferential comprehension of a passage. To examine such differences, we analyzed the degree to which distinct cognitive skills (semantic and syntactic awareness, inferencing, planning/organizing) contribute to performance on varying types of texts and questions. This study found main effects of text and question types, as well as an interaction in which relations between question types varied between text types. Analyses indicated that higher order cognitive skills, including the ability to make inferences and to plan and organize information, contribute to comprehension of more complex text (e.g., expository vs. narrative) and question types (e.g., inferential vs. literal), and therefore are important components of reading for later elementary and middle school students. These findings suggest that developing these skills in early elementary school may better equip students for comprehending the texts they will encounter in higher grades.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0027182

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Surface characteristics and content of texts affect both the quality of reading comprehension and rates of mind wandering in readers.

    “Available evidence has repeatedly shown that surface characteristics (e.g., font size, letter spacing), as well as those related to content (e.g., narrative vs. scientific texts, text complexity), affect both the quality of reading comprehension and rates of MW in readers (Best et al., 2008;Eason et al., 2012;Tobia & Bonifacci, 2020).”

    From Text‐to‐speech applications to reduce mind wandering in students with dyslexia (2022) · cites this paper as Eason et al., 2012

    The General Discussion (page unavailable) says comprehension performance may vary with passage and question types, supporting the claim about text content and comprehension. The paper does not address mind-wandering rates or effects of font size and letter spacing; searches for those terms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Cain K Oakhill J 2007 Reading comprehension difficulties: Correlates, causes, and consequences Cain K Oakhill J Children’s comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective New York, NY Guilford Press
  2. Catts HW Adlof SM Weismer SE 2006 Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 49 278 293 16671844
  3. Colheart M 1981 The MRC psycholinguistic database The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 33 497 505
  4. Cutting LE Materek A Cole CAS Levine TM Mahone EM 2009 Effects of fluency, oral language, and executive function on reading comprehension performance Annals of Dyslexia 59 1 34 54 19396550 PMC2757040
  5. Eason SH Sabatini JP Goldberg LF Bruce KM Cutting LE in press Examining the relationship between word reading efficiency and oral reading rate in predicting comprehension among different types of readers Scientific Studies of Reading PMC3646383 23667307
  6. Graesser AC McNamara DS Louwerse MM Cai Z 2004 Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36 193 202 15354684
  7. Graesser AC Singer M Trabasso T 1994 Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension Psychological Review 101 371 395 7938337
  8. Haberlandt KF Graesser AC 1985 Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 114 357 374
  9. Jenkins JR Fuchs LS van den Broek P Espin C Deno SL 2003 Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency Journal of Educational Psychology 95 4 719 729
  10. Kendeou P van den Broek P White MJ Lynch JS 2009 Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: The independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills Journal of Educational Psychology 101 4 765 778
  11. Kintsch W 1988 The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model Psychological Review 95 163 182 3375398
  12. Kintsch W 1994 Text comprehension, memory, and learning American Psychologist 49 294 303 8203801
  13. Kintsch W 1998 Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press
  14. Locascio G Mahone EM Eason SE Cutting LE 2010 Executive dysfunction among children with reading comprehension deficits Journal of Learning Disabilities OnlineFirst 0 1 14 10.1177/0022219409355476 PMC2934874 20375294 · DOI
  15. Lyon GR 1995 Toward a definition of dyslexia Annals of Dyslexia 45 3 27 24234186
  16. McNamara DS Graesser AC Louwerse MM in press Sources of text difficulty: Across the ages and genres Sabatini JP Albo E Assessing reading in the 21st century: Aligning and applying advances in the reading and measurement sciences Lanham, MD R&L Education
  17. Medina AL Pilonieta P 2006 Once upon a time: Comprehending narrative text Schumm JS Reading assessment and instruction for all learners 222 261 New York, NY The Guilford Press
  18. Nation K Clarke P Snowling MJ 2002 General cognitive ability in children with reading comprehension difficulties British Journal of Educational Psychology 72 549 560 12495566
  19. Ozuru Y Rowe M O’Reilly T McNamara DS 2008 Where’s the difficulty in standardized reading tests: The passage of the question? Behavior Research Methods 40 1001 1015 19001391
  20. Raphael TE Pearson PD 1985 Increasing students’ awareness of sources of information for answering questions American Educational Research Journal 22 217 236
  21. Raphael TE Winograd P Pearson PD 1980 Strategies children use when answering questions Kamil ML Moe AJ Perspectives on reading research and instruction 56 63 Washington, DC National Reading Conference
  22. Raphael TE Wonnacott CA 1985 Heightening fouth-grade students’ sensitivity to sources of information for answering comprehension questions Reading Research Quarterly 20 282 296
  23. Samuelstuen MS Braten I 2005 Decoding, knowledge, and strategies in comprehension of expository text Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 46 107 117 15762939
  24. Sesma HW Mahone EM Levine T Eason SH Cutting LE 2009 The contribution of executive skills to reading comprehension Child Neuropsychology 15 3 232 246 18629674 PMC2728040
  25. Stenner JA 1996 Measuring reading comprehension within the lexile framework Paper presented at the California Comparability Symposium October 1996 Retrieved from http://www.lexile.com/research/12/
  26. Storch SA Whitehurst GJ 2002 Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model Developmental Psychology 38 6 934 947 12428705
  27. Swanson HL 1999 Reading comprehension and working memory in learning-disabled readers: Is the phonological loop more important than the executive system? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 72 1 1 31 9888984
  28. Tilstra J McMaster K van den Broek P Kendeou P Rapp D 2009 Simple but complex: Components of the simple view of reading across grade levels Journal of Research in Reading 32 4 383 401

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eason, S. H., Goldberg, L. F., Young, K. M., Geist, M. C., & Cutting, L. E.
Affiliations
Kennedy Krieger Institute (US)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2012-08
Volume
104
Issue
3
Pages
515-528
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2170300389
Cited by
229
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15
FWCI
27.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Health (grant 1RO1 HD044073)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
Keywords
reading comprehension, text types, question types, inferencing, semantic awareness, syntactic awareness, planning and organization, literal comprehension, inferential comprehension, narrative texts, expository texts, functional texts, cognitive skills, children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review