Cited by 256Stress and Burnout ResearchHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutOccupational Health and Burnout

Insufficient sleep predicts clinical burnout.

Söderström, Marie, Jeding, Kerstin, Ekstedt, Mirjam, Perski, Aleksander, Åkerstedt, Torbjörn·2012·Journal of Occupational Health Psychology

Abstract

The present prospective study aimed to identify risk factors for subsequent clinical burnout. Three hundred eighty-eight working individuals completed a baseline questionnaire regarding work stress, sleep, mood, health, and so forth. During a 2-year period, 15 subjects (7 women and 8 men) of the total sample were identified as "burnout cases," as they were assessed and referred to treatment for clinical burnout. Questionnaire data from the baseline measurement were used as independent variables in a series of logistic regression analyses to predict clinical burnout. The results identified "too little sleep (< 6 h)" as the main risk factor for burnout development, with adjustment for "work demands," "thoughts of work during leisure time," and "sleep quality." The first two factors were significant predictors in earlier steps of the multivariate regression. The results indicate that insufficient sleep, preoccupation with thoughts of work during leisure time, and high work demands are risk factors for subsequent burnout. The results suggest a chain of causation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0027518

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prospective studies of patients with ED indicate that sleep is important in the recovery of ED.

    “Prospective studies of patients with ED indicate that sleep is important in the recovery of ED (Ekstedt et al., 2009; Grossi et al., 2015; Söderström et al., 2012).”

    From Mediators during a Multimodal intervention for stress-induced exhaustion disorder (2024) · cites this paper as Söderström et al., 2012

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 256

Authors
Söderström, M., Jeding, K., Ekstedt, M., Perski, A., & Åkerstedt, T.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Venue
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
Published
2012-04
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
175-183
ISSN
  • 1076-8998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1307
OpenAlex
W2061013306
Cited by
256
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9
FWCI
13.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • OMX
  • Swedish Working Life Institute
  • Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
insufficient sleep, risk factors, job demands, sleep quality, occupational stress, burnout prediction
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Anxiety, Burnout, Professional, Depression, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sleep Deprivation, Social Support, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review