Nonpharmacological interventions for preschool ADHD: State of the evidence and implications for practice.
Abstract
What exactly is the psychologist to do to increase the probability that intervention can alter the multiple impairments and often poor long-term outcomes associated with preschool-onset attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)? Intervening to support a preschool child with ADHD is complex given the child’s developmental stage and the need to coordinate services across multiple people and settings. Identifying what interventions have been empirically evaluated and the extent to which these interventions affect ADHD-related behaviors and impairments is a critical first-step to providing quality care for these children. Recent guidelines set forth by the American Academy of Pediatrics (2011, ADHD: Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of attention/deficit-hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 128, 1007–1022. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-2654) recommend that medication only be used when behavioral interventions are not available or when significant room for improvement exists following effective implementation of behavioral interventions. As such, we review herein nonpharmacological interventions for preschool ADHD, identifying approaches in the published literature focused on training parents, teachers, and children, as well as dietary restrictions, nutritional supplements, and acupuncture interventions. This review suggests that behaviorally based approaches focused on parent and teacher training are the most well-studied and effective interventions. Child-training approaches, dietary interventions, nutritional supplements, and acupuncture require substantially more evaluation before clinical implications can be fully appreciated. We conclude by discussing key principles gleaned from this literature for psychological practice for the treatment of preschool children with ADHD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Behavioral intervention effects do not seem to transfer to settings or behaviors that were not targeted.
“the effects of behavioral interventions do not appear to generalize to non-targeted settings or non-targeted behaviors”
From Improving Outcomes for Youth with ADHD: A Conceptual Framework for Combined Neurocognitive and Skill-Based Treatment Approaches (2014) · cites this paper as Rajwan, et al., 2012
Skill-based interventions continue to show intervention-specific functional benefits in the short term.
“we expect skill-based interventions to continue to evince intervention-specific functional benefits in the short-term (Evans et al., 2013; Fabiano et al., 2009; Rajwan et al., 2012)”
From Improving Outcomes for Youth with ADHD: A Conceptual Framework for Combined Neurocognitive and Skill-Based Treatment Approaches (2014) · cites this paper as Rajwan et al., 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 33
- Authors
- Rajwan, E., Chacko, A., & Moeller, M.
- ORCID
- Chacko, Anil
- Venue
- Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 520-526
- ISSN
- 0735-7028 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1323
- OpenAlex
- W2335658577
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 2.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Professional Psychology Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- non-pharmacological treatment, behavioral interventions, parent training, teacher professional development, child training, dietary intervention, dietary supplements, acupuncture, American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review