CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 44Gender Roles and Identity StudiesSexual function and dysfunction studiesSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Relationships among Body Image, Masculinity, and Sexual Satisfaction in Men

Daniel, Samantha, Bridges, Sara K.·2013·Psychology of Men & Masculinity
DOI 10.1037/a0029154
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships among body image, masculinity, and subjective sexual satisfaction in men in order to develop a predictive model of sexual satisfaction. Previous researchers have found a relationship between negative body image and lower sexual satisfaction with women, but limited research exists assessing this relationship for men. Similarly, adherence to traditional masculine gender roles may influence sexual satisfaction by prescribing the scripts men use to evaluate their sexual experiences, though this has rarely been examined as well. This exploratory study sought to clarify the relationships among these variables in 153 college men (Age M = 21.43, SD = 4.05) from a southern private university in the United States. Results indicated that the set of variables explained 12.1% of the variance in sexual satisfaction with only 1 of the 5 variables having a significant unique influence on sexual satisfaction, F(5, 147) = 4.050, p < .01. Specifically, masculinity was identified as the only statistically significant predictor of sexual satisfaction for this sample (t = 3.231, p < .01, ? = .238). The role of body image and masculinity variables in sexuality research with men in the future are discussed. © 2012 American Psychological Association.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0029154

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 59 references

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 44

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Daniel, S., & Bridges, S. K.
ORCID
Venue
Psychology of Men & Masculinity
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2013-10
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
345-351
ISSN
  • 1524-9220 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-151X
DOI
10.1037/a0029154
OpenAlex
W2167641472
Cited by
44
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology of Men & Masculinity (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalCommons@Fayetteville State University (Fayetteville State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
body image, masculinity, sexual satisfaction, male sexuality, male university students, sexual scripts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review