Rewriting the Language of Creativity: The Five A's Framework
Abstract
For the past 5 decades the psychology of creativity has been influenced by what is known as the 4 P's of creative expression: person, process, product, and press. This conceptual schema, initially proposed by Rhodes (1961) , helped researchers structure their thinking about the phenomenon. However, it also supported an individualistic, static, and oftentimes disjointed vision of creativity. The present article aims to rewrite this fundamental language of the discipline by using terms that explicitly endorse a systemic, contextual, and dynamic approach. The 5 A's framework—actor, action, artifact, audience, affordances—is grounded in current literature from sociocultural and ecological psychology as well as theories of the distributed mind and tries to achieve a more comprehensive and unitary perspective on creativity. Several theoretical, methodological, and practical implications are considered.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals partly blame AI rather than attributing all responsibility to their conversation partners.
“where research shows individuals partly blame AI rather than attributing all responsibility to their conversation partners [36].”
From Exploring the Collaborative Co-Creation Process with AI: A Case Study in Novice Music Production (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 142 · Cited by 660
- Authors
- Glăveanu, V. P.
- Affiliations
- Aalborg University (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Glăveanu, Vlad Petre
- ORCID
- Glăveanu, Vlad Petre
- Venue
- Review of General Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-81
- ISSN
- 1089-2680 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1552
- OpenAlex
- W1924014452
- Cited by
- 660
- References
- 142
- Citations by year
- 2026: 66 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 12.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Review of General Psychology (publishedVersion)
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Keywords
- psychology of creativity, distributed cognition, sociocultural psychology, ecological psychology, creative expression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review