Cited by 58Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and Memory

Evidence that the rat hippocampus has contrasting roles in object recognition memory and object recency memory

Open access
Albasser, Mathieu M., Amin, Eman, Lin, Tzu-Ching E., Iordanova, Mihaela D., Aggleton, John P.·2012·Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Adult rats with extensive, bilateral neurotoxic lesions of the hippocampus showed normal forgetting curves for object recognition memory, yet were impaired on closely related tests of object recency memory. The present findings point to specific mechanisms for temporal order information (recency) that are dependent on the hippocampus and do not involve object recognition memory. The object recognition tests measured rats exploring simultaneously presented objects, one novel and the other familiar. Task difficulty was varied by altering the retention delays after presentation of the familiar object, so creating a forgetting curve. Hippocampal lesions had no apparent effect, despite using an apparatus (bow-tie maze) where it was possible to give lists of objects that might be expected to increase stimulus interference. In contrast, the same hippocampal lesions impaired the normal preference for an older (less recent) familiar object over a more recent, familiar object. A correlation was found between the loss of septal hippocampal tissue and this impairment in recency memory. The dissociation in the present study between recognition memory (spared) and recency memory (impaired) was unusually compelling, because it was possible to test the same objects for both forms of memory within the same session and within the same apparatus. The object recency deficit is of additional interest as it provides an example of a nonspatial memory deficit following hippocampal damage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0029754

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 58

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wagner A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In Spear N. E., & Miller R. R. (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5– 47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Authors
Albasser, M. M., Amin, E., Lin, T.-C. E., Iordanova, M. D., & Aggleton, J. P.
Affiliations
Cardiff University (GB)
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2012-10
Volume
126
Issue
5
Pages
659-669
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W1996388586
Cited by
58
References
66
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (087855)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
hippocampus, object recognition memory, temporal order memory, hippocampal lesions, forgetting curve
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Exploratory Behavior, Hippocampus, Male, Mental Recall, Maze Learning, Recognition, Psychology, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review