Evidence that the rat hippocampus has contrasting roles in object recognition memory and object recency memory
Open accessAbstract
Adult rats with extensive, bilateral neurotoxic lesions of the hippocampus showed normal forgetting curves for object recognition memory, yet were impaired on closely related tests of object recency memory. The present findings point to specific mechanisms for temporal order information (recency) that are dependent on the hippocampus and do not involve object recognition memory. The object recognition tests measured rats exploring simultaneously presented objects, one novel and the other familiar. Task difficulty was varied by altering the retention delays after presentation of the familiar object, so creating a forgetting curve. Hippocampal lesions had no apparent effect, despite using an apparatus (bow-tie maze) where it was possible to give lists of objects that might be expected to increase stimulus interference. In contrast, the same hippocampal lesions impaired the normal preference for an older (less recent) familiar object over a more recent, familiar object. A correlation was found between the loss of septal hippocampal tissue and this impairment in recency memory. The dissociation in the present study between recognition memory (spared) and recency memory (impaired) was unusually compelling, because it was possible to test the same objects for both forms of memory within the same session and within the same apparatus. The object recency deficit is of additional interest as it provides an example of a nonspatial memory deficit following hippocampal damage.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The majority of studies employing hippocampal lesions in rats failed to report an influence in the NOP test.
“whereas the majority of the studies employing hippocampal lesions in rats failed to report an influence in the NOP test (Albasser et al., 2012; Albasser et al., 2010; Barker and Warburton, 2011b; Forwood et al., 2005; Gaskin et al., 2003; Good et al., 2007a; Langston and Wood, 2010; Mumby et al., 2005; Piterkin et al., 2008; Tam et al., 2014; Winters et al., 2004).”
From The medial prefrontal cortex - hippocampus circuit that integrates information of object, place and time to construct episodic memory in rodents: Behavioral, anatomical and neurochemical properties (2020) · cites this paper as Albasser et al., 2012
Lesion studies have indicated the hippocampus to have a pivotal role in the processing of memory for object recency and/or for temporal order recognition.
“Lesion studies have indicated the hippocampus to have a pivotal role in the processing of memory for object recency and/or for temporal order recognition (Albasser et al., 2012; Barker and Warburton, 2011b), but see (Tam et al., 2014).”
From The medial prefrontal cortex - hippocampus circuit that integrates information of object, place and time to construct episodic memory in rodents: Behavioral, anatomical and neurochemical properties (2020) · cites this paper as Albasser et al., 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 58
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Wagner A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In Spear N. E., & Miller R. R. (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5– 47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Authors
- Albasser, M. M., Amin, E., Lin, T.-C. E., Iordanova, M. D., & Aggleton, J. P.
- Affiliations
- Cardiff University (GB)
- Venue
- Behavioral Neuroscience
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 659-669
- ISSN
- 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0084
- PMC
- PMC3462035
- OpenAlex
- W1996388586
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (087855)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- hippocampus, object recognition memory, temporal order memory, hippocampal lesions, forgetting curve
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Exploratory Behavior, Hippocampus, Male, Mental Recall, Maze Learning, Recognition, Psychology, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review