The co-occurrence of pain and depression in adults with multiple sclerosis
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: To define the rates of pain, depression, and their co-occurrence in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: Participants were 161 persons with MS who previously participated in research and indicated a willingness to be contacted for future studies. Data were collected via postal survey and included the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for depressive symptoms and a numerical rating scale (0-10) for pain. Descriptive statistics, chi-square analyses, and odds ratios were calculated to describe the prevalence, difference, and likelihood of depression, pain, and their comorbidity. RESULTS: Some level of pain was experienced by 73% of the sample, with 40% of the entire sample reporting moderate or worse pain severity. Clinically significant levels of depressive symptoms were reported by 22% of the sample, and 8% reported sufficient symptoms to meet major depressive episode diagnostic criteria. Of persons meeting depression criteria, 86-100% reported experiencing any pain; 67-77% of persons meeting depression criteria reported experiencing pain of at least moderate severity. Of persons experiencing any pain, 11-34% met depression criteria; 15-37% of persons experiencing pain of at least moderate severity met depression criteria. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Pain and depression co-occur frequently in persons with MS. However, it is more common for individuals with depression to report pain than for individuals with pain to endorse symptoms of depression. Future studies should explore the implications of this co-occurrence, such as whether these individuals experience greater levels of disability, higher medical costs, or fewer benefits from treatment than persons with either condition alone.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 56
- Authors
- Alschuler, K. N., Ehde, D. M., & Jensen, M. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Rehabilitation Psychology
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 217-221
- ISSN
- 0090-5550 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1544
- PMC
- PMC4467568
- OpenAlex
- W2083732612
- Semantic Scholar
- 81ff32c404925c9cccd1abbb8ccb4226b7668358
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Rehabilitation Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- National Multiple Sclerosis Society (MB 0008)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, pain, depression, comorbidities, depressive symptoms, pain intensity, prevalence
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Multiple Sclerosis, Pain, Pain Measurement, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Washington, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Odds Ratio
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review