Cited by 63Face Recognition and PerceptionEmotions and Moral BehaviorDeception detection and forensic psychology

That “poker face” just might lose you the game! the impact of expressive suppression and mimicry on sensitivity to facial expressions of emotion

Schneider, Kristin G., Hempel, Roelie J., Lynch, Thomas R.·2013·Emotion

Abstract

Successful interpersonal functioning often requires both the ability to mask inner feelings and the ability to accurately recognize others' expressions--but what if effortful control of emotional expressions impacts the ability to accurately read others? In this study, we examined the influence of self-controlled expressive suppression and mimicry on facial affect sensitivity--the speed with which one can accurately identify gradually intensifying facial expressions of emotion. Muscle activity of the brow (corrugator, related to anger), upper lip (levator, related to disgust), and cheek (zygomaticus, related to happiness) were recorded using facial electromyography while participants randomized to one of three conditions (Suppress, Mimic, and No-Instruction) viewed a series of six distinct emotional expressions (happiness, sadness, fear, anger, surprise, and disgust) as they morphed from neutral to full expression. As hypothesized, individuals instructed to suppress their own facial expressions showed impairment in facial affect sensitivity. Conversely, mimicry of emotion expressions appeared to facilitate facial affect sensitivity. Results suggest that it is difficult for a person to be able to simultaneously mask inner feelings and accurately "read" the facial expressions of others, at least when these expressions are at low intensity. The combined behavioral and physiological data suggest that the strategies an individual selects to control his or her own expression of emotion have important implications for interpersonal functioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0032847

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 103 · Cited by 63

Authors
Schneider, K. G., Hempel, R. J., & Lynch, T. R.
Affiliations
  • United States Department of Defense (US)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2013-10
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
852-866
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2085128415
Cited by
63
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Duke University Graduate School
  • Duke University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
expressive suppression, mimicry, emotional facial expressions, emotion regulation, effortful control, facial electromyography, corrugator supercilii, zygomaticus major, levator labii superioris, emotion recognition, interpersonal functioning
MeSH terms
Anger, Electromyography, Emotions, Face, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Happiness, Humans, Repression, Psychology, Social Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review