That “poker face” just might lose you the game! the impact of expressive suppression and mimicry on sensitivity to facial expressions of emotion
Abstract
Successful interpersonal functioning often requires both the ability to mask inner feelings and the ability to accurately recognize others' expressions--but what if effortful control of emotional expressions impacts the ability to accurately read others? In this study, we examined the influence of self-controlled expressive suppression and mimicry on facial affect sensitivity--the speed with which one can accurately identify gradually intensifying facial expressions of emotion. Muscle activity of the brow (corrugator, related to anger), upper lip (levator, related to disgust), and cheek (zygomaticus, related to happiness) were recorded using facial electromyography while participants randomized to one of three conditions (Suppress, Mimic, and No-Instruction) viewed a series of six distinct emotional expressions (happiness, sadness, fear, anger, surprise, and disgust) as they morphed from neutral to full expression. As hypothesized, individuals instructed to suppress their own facial expressions showed impairment in facial affect sensitivity. Conversely, mimicry of emotion expressions appeared to facilitate facial affect sensitivity. Results suggest that it is difficult for a person to be able to simultaneously mask inner feelings and accurately "read" the facial expressions of others, at least when these expressions are at low intensity. The combined behavioral and physiological data suggest that the strategies an individual selects to control his or her own expression of emotion have important implications for interpersonal functioning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The behavior of masking one's true feelings has been demonstrated to lead to negative reactions from others in social encounters.
“The behavior of masking one's true feelings has been demonstrated to lead to negative reactions from others in social encounters (139–141).”
From MDMA-Assisted Therapy as a Means to Alter Affective, Cognitive, Behavioral, and Neurological Systems Underlying Social Dysfunction in Social Anxiety Disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [140]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 103 · Cited by 63
- Authors
- Schneider, K. G., Hempel, R. J., & Lynch, T. R.
- Affiliations
- United States Department of Defense (US)
- University of Southampton (GB)
- Venue
- Emotion
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 852-866
- ISSN
- 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-1516
- OpenAlex
- W2085128415
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 103
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 2.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Emotion (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Duke University Graduate School
- Duke University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Keywords
- expressive suppression, mimicry, emotional facial expressions, emotion regulation, effortful control, facial electromyography, corrugator supercilii, zygomaticus major, levator labii superioris, emotion recognition, interpersonal functioning
- MeSH terms
- Anger, Electromyography, Emotions, Face, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Happiness, Humans, Repression, Psychology, Social Perception, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review