Cited by 489Social and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchCounseling Practices and Supervision

Color-blind racial ideology: Theory, training, and measurement implications in psychology.

Neville, Helen A., Awad, Germine H., Brooks, James E., Flores, Michelle P., Bluemel, Jamie·2013·American Psychologist

Abstract

Synthesizing the interdisciplinary literature, we characterize color-blind racial ideology (CBRI) as consisting of two interrelated domains: color-evasion (i.e., denial of racial differences by emphasizing sameness) and power-evasion (i.e., denial of racism by emphasizing equal opportunities). Mounting empirical data suggest that the color-evasion dimension is ineffective and in fact promotes interracial tension and potential inequality. CBRI may be conceived as an ultramodern or contemporary form of racism and a legitimizing ideology used to justify the racial status quo. Four types of CBRI are described: denial of (a) race, (b) blatant racial issues, (c) institutional racism, and (d) White privilege. We discuss empirical findings suggesting a relationship between CBRI and increased racial prejudice, racial anger, and racial fear. Implications for education, training, and research are provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0033282

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 68 · Cited by 489

Authors
Neville, H. A., Awad, G. H., Brooks, J. E., Flores, M. P., & Bluemel, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • The Chicago School (US)
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
2013
Volume
68
Issue
6
Pages
455-466
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W1991012811
Cited by
489
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9
FWCI
46.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
racism, institutional racism, white privilege, racial prejudice, racial fear, anti-racism training
MeSH terms
Asian, Black or African American, Culture, Denial, Psychological, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Indians, North American, Power, Psychological, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Cultural Diversity, White People, Health Status Disparities, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review