Color-blind racial ideology: Theory, training, and measurement implications in psychology.
Abstract
Synthesizing the interdisciplinary literature, we characterize color-blind racial ideology (CBRI) as consisting of two interrelated domains: color-evasion (i.e., denial of racial differences by emphasizing sameness) and power-evasion (i.e., denial of racism by emphasizing equal opportunities). Mounting empirical data suggest that the color-evasion dimension is ineffective and in fact promotes interracial tension and potential inequality. CBRI may be conceived as an ultramodern or contemporary form of racism and a legitimizing ideology used to justify the racial status quo. Four types of CBRI are described: denial of (a) race, (b) blatant racial issues, (c) institutional racism, and (d) White privilege. We discuss empirical findings suggesting a relationship between CBRI and increased racial prejudice, racial anger, and racial fear. Implications for education, training, and research are provided.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 68 · Cited by 489
- Authors
- Neville, H. A., Awad, G. H., Brooks, J. E., Flores, M. P., & Bluemel, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- The Chicago School (US)
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 455-466
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W1991012811
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9
- FWCI
- 46.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Keywords
- racism, institutional racism, white privilege, racial prejudice, racial fear, anti-racism training
- MeSH terms
- Asian, Black or African American, Culture, Denial, Psychological, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Indians, North American, Power, Psychological, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Cultural Diversity, White People, Health Status Disparities, Racism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review