Personality-informed interventions for healthy aging: Conclusions from a National Institute on Aging work group.
Open accessAbstract
We describe 2 frameworks in which personality dimensions relevant to health, such as Conscientiousness, can be used to inform interventions designed to promote health aging. First, contemporary data and theory do not suggest that personality is "immutable," but instead focus on questions of who changes, in what way, why, when, and how. In fact, the notion that personality could be changed was part and parcel of many schools of psychotherapy, which suggested that long-term and meaningful change in symptoms could not be achieved without change in relevant aspects of personality. We review intervention research documenting change in personality. On the basis of an integrative view of personality as a complex system, we describe a bottom-up model of change in which interventions to change basic personality processes eventuate in changes at the trait level. A 2nd framework leverages the descriptive and predictive power of personality to tailor individual risk prediction and treatment, as well as refine public health programs, to the relevant dispositional characteristics of the target population. These methods dovetail with, and add a systematic and rigorous psychosocial dimension to, the personalized medicine and patient-centeredness movements in medicine. In addition to improving health through earlier intervention and increased fit between treatments and persons, cost-effectiveness improvements can be realized by more accurate resource allocation. Numerous examples from the personality, health, and aging literature on Conscientiousness and other traits are provided throughout, and we conclude with a series of recommendations for research in these emerging areas.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals who are higher in conscientiousness report lower levels of stress and more effective coping styles.
“For instance, individuals who are higher in conscientiousness report lower levels of stress (51) and more effective coping styles (58), which might protect against stress-induced systemic inflammation in low-SES circumstances characterized by greater prevalence and severity of stressors (32).”
From Socioeconomic Status Interacts with Conscientiousness and Neuroticism to Predict Circulating Concentrations of Inflammatory Markers (2017) · cites this paper as [51]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 189 · Cited by 166
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Costa PT McCrae RR Age changes in personality and their origins: Comment on Roberts, Walton, and Viechtbauer (2006) Psychological bulletin 2006 132 1 26 28 16435955
- James W Principles of Psychology 1890 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press
- Lenzenweger MF Willett JB Predicting individual change in personality disorder features by simultaneous individual change in personality dimensions linked to neurobehavioral systems: The longitudinal study of personality disorders Journal of abnormal psychology 2007 116 4 684 700 18020716
- McCrae RR Costa PT Personality in Adulthood 2003 Vol. 2nd New York Guilford
- Rothman KJ Greenland S Lash TL Modern Epidemiology 2008 3rd ed Philadelphia, PA Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- Vargas MJ Dymond CRRRF Changes in self-awareness during client-centered therapy Psychotherapy and Cersonality Change 1954 Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press
- Authors
- Chapman, B. P., Hampson, S., & Clarkin, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- Oregon Research Institute (US)
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- ORCID
- Chapman, Benjamin P.
- Venue
- Developmental Psychology
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1426-1441
- ISSN
- 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0599
- PMC
- PMC3940665
- OpenAlex
- W1971687726
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 189
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 12.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ag020048-24)
- National Institute on Aging (K08AG031328, R01-AG020048)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- healthy aging, conscientiousness, personality change, personalized medicine, risk prediction, treatment tailoring, public health programs, cost-effectiveness, psychotherapy
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Health, Humans, Human Development, Models, Psychological, Personality, United States, Public Health Practice, National Institute on Aging (U.S.), Precision Medicine, Health Communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review