Differing pathways between religiousness, spirituality, and health: A self-regulation perspective.
Abstract
The literature on religiousness, spirituality (R/S), and health has increased dramatically in the past decade, but suffers from a lack of integrative theoretical models and well-defined constructs. Drawing on self-regulation theory, we hypothesized that the effects of religiousness (e.g., affiliatio
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
R/S is theorized to affect physical health via two primary pathways: behavioral self-regulation and emotional self-regulation.
“R/S is theorized to affect physical health via two primary pathways: behavioral self-regulation and emotional self-regulation.13, 14”
From Religion, spirituality, and physical health in cancer patients: A meta‐analysis (2015) · cites this paper as [13]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 77 · Cited by 171
- Authors
- Aldwin, C. M., Park, C. L., Jeong, Y.-J., & Nath, R.
- Affiliations
- Oregon State University (US)
- University of Connecticut (US)
- Venue
- Psychology of Religion and Spirituality
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-21
- ISSN
- 1941-1022 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-1562
- OpenAlex
- W1970562418
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 14.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology of Religion and Spirituality (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- John Templeton Foundation (21733)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
- Keywords
- religiosity, spirituality, health, self-regulation theory, affiliation, integrative theoretical model, construct definition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
