Mechanisms for widespread hippocampal involvement in cognition.
Open accessAbstract
The quintessential memory system in the human brain--the hippocampus and surrounding medial temporal lobe--is often treated as a module for the formation of conscious, or declarative, memories. However, growing evidence suggests that the hippocampus plays a broader role in memory and cognition and that theories organizing memory into strictly dedicated systems may need to be updated. We first consider the historical evidence for the specialized role of the hippocampus in declarative memory. Then, we describe the serendipitous encounter that motivated the special section in this issue, based on parallel research from our labs that suggested a more pervasive contribution of the hippocampus to cognition beyond declarative memory. Finally, we develop a theoretical framework that describes 2 general mechanisms for how the hippocampus interacts with other brain systems and cognitive processes: the memory modulation hypothesis, in which mnemonic representations in the hippocampus modulate the operation of other systems, and the adaptive function hypothesis, in which specialized computations in the hippocampus are recruited as a component of both mnemonic and nonmnemonic functions. This framework is consistent with an emerging view that the most fertile ground for discovery in cognitive psychology and neuroscience lies at the interface between parts of the mind and brain that have traditionally been studied in isolation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many so-called domain-general areas engage in multiple functions, differing from domain-specific areas such as primary visual cortex that perform a very specific function.
“emerging evidence indicates that many so-called “domain-general” areas engage in multiple functions, differing from “domain-specific” areas such as primary visual cortex that perform a very specific function (1, 2).”
From Dynamic reconfiguration of frontal brain networks during executive cognition in humans (2015) · cites this paper as [1]
Theoretical frameworks for working memory call on the interplay of distinct components and their integration in broader cognitive circuits.
“Theoretical frameworks for working memory call on the interplay of distinct components (12) and their integration in broader cognitive circuits (1).”
From Dynamic reconfiguration of frontal brain networks during executive cognition in humans (2015) · cites this paper as [1]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 145 · Cited by 187
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Lashley KS 1950 In search of the engram Physiological mechanisms in animal behavior 454 482 Cambridge University Press
- Authors
- Shohamy, D., & Turk-Browne, N. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1159-1170
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- PMC
- PMC4065494
- OpenAlex
- W2039840443
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 145
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 10
- FWCI
- 8.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (R01-NS078784, R01-EY021755)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- hippocampus, medial temporal lobe, declarative memory, memory systems, hippocampal-cortical interaction, cognitive control
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Decision Making, Hippocampus, Humans, Memory, Functional Neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review