Cited by 101Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and MemoryAging and Gerontology Research

The malleability of working memory and visuospatial skills: A randomized controlled study in older adults.

Stepankova, Hana, Lukavsky, Jiri, Buschkuehl, Martin, Kopecek, Miloslav, Ripova, Daniela, Jaeggi, Susanne M.·2014·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

There is accumulating evidence that training on working memory (WM) generalizes to other nontrained domains, and there are reports of transfer effects extending as far as to measures of fluid intelligence. Although there have been several demonstrations of such transfer effects in young adults and children, they have been difficult to demonstrate in older adults. In this study, we investigated the generalizing effects of an adaptive WM intervention on nontrained measures of WM and visuospatial skills. We randomly assigned healthy older adults to train on a verbal n-back task over the course of a month for either 10 or 20 sessions. Their performance change was compared with that of a control group. Our results revealed reliable group effects in nontrained standard clinical measures of WM and visuospatial skills in that both training groups outperformed the control group. We also observed a dose-response effect, that is, a positive relationship between training frequency and the gain in visuospatial skills; this finding was further confirmed by a positive correlation between training improvement and transfer. The improvements in visuospatial skills emerged even though the intervention was restricted to the verbal domain. Our work has important implications in that our data provide further evidence for plasticity of cognitive functions in old age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0034913

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 95 · Cited by 101

Authors
Stepankova, H., Lukavsky, J., Buschkuehl, M., Kopecek, M., Ripova, D., & Jaeggi, S. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2014-04
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
1049-1059
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2158130874
Cited by
101
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10
FWCI
13.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ASEP (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
  • Prague Psychiatric Center (MH CZ-DRO: PCP 00023752)
  • Charles University
  • Office of Naval Research
  • U.S. Institute for Educational Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
working memory training, visuospatial ability, older adults, transfer of learning, fluid intelligence, n-back task, dose-response relationship, cognitive plasticity, aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Practice, Psychological, Psychological Tests, Space Perception, Transfer, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review