Cited by 389Personality Traits and PsychologySocial and Intergroup PsychologyEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

The far-reaching effects of believing people can change: Implicit theories of personality shape stress, health, and achievement during adolescence.

Yeager, David Scott, Johnson, Rebecca, Spitzer, Brian James, Trzesniewski, Kali H., Powers, Joseph, Dweck, Carol S.·2014·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

The belief that personality is fixed (an entity theory of personality) can give rise to negative reactions to social adversities. Three studies showed that when social adversity is common-at the transition to high school--an entity theory can affect overall stress, health, and achievement. Study 1 showed that an entity theory of personality, measured during the 1st month of 9th grade, predicted more negative immediate reactions to social adversity and, at the end of the year, greater stress, poorer health, and lower grades in school. Studies 2 and 3, both experiments, tested a brief intervention that taught a malleable (incremental) theory of personality--the belief that people can change. The incremental theory group showed less negative reactions to an immediate experience of social adversity and, 8 months later, reported lower overall stress and physical illness. They also achieved better academic performance over the year. Discussion centers on the power of targeted psychological interventions to effect far-reaching and long-term change by shifting interpretations of recurring adversities during developmental transitions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0036335

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 93 · Cited by 389

Authors
Yeager, D. S., Johnson, R., Spitzer, B. J., Trzesniewski, K. H., Powers, J., & Dweck, C. S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • University of California System (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2014
Volume
106
Issue
6
Pages
867-884
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2031725313
Cited by
389
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2
FWCI
30.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
implicit theories of personality, entity theory, incremental theory, social adversity, stress, adolescent health, academic performance, developmental transitions, transition to high school, brief psychological intervention
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Male, Personality, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Stress, Psychological, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review