The far-reaching effects of believing people can change: Implicit theories of personality shape stress, health, and achievement during adolescence.
Abstract
The belief that personality is fixed (an entity theory of personality) can give rise to negative reactions to social adversities. Three studies showed that when social adversity is common-at the transition to high school--an entity theory can affect overall stress, health, and achievement. Study 1 showed that an entity theory of personality, measured during the 1st month of 9th grade, predicted more negative immediate reactions to social adversity and, at the end of the year, greater stress, poorer health, and lower grades in school. Studies 2 and 3, both experiments, tested a brief intervention that taught a malleable (incremental) theory of personality--the belief that people can change. The incremental theory group showed less negative reactions to an immediate experience of social adversity and, 8 months later, reported lower overall stress and physical illness. They also achieved better academic performance over the year. Discussion centers on the power of targeted psychological interventions to effect far-reaching and long-term change by shifting interpretations of recurring adversities during developmental transitions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students who see a prosocial purpose to a particular academic task are more likely to persist, despite difficulty or boredom.
“Students who see a prosocial purpose to a particular academic task are more likely to persist, despite difficulty or boredom (Yeager et al., 2014).”
From Malleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context<sup>1</sup> (2019) · cites this paper as Yeager et al., 2014
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 93 · Cited by 389
- Authors
- Yeager, D. S., Johnson, R., Spitzer, B. J., Trzesniewski, K. H., Powers, J., & Dweck, C. S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- New York University (US)
- University of California System (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 867-884
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2031725313
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 30.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- implicit theories of personality, entity theory, incremental theory, social adversity, stress, adolescent health, academic performance, developmental transitions, transition to high school, brief psychological intervention
- MeSH terms
- Achievement, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Male, Personality, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Stress, Psychological, Students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review