Cited by 11Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory Processes and InfluencesChild Abuse and Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Implicit and explicit memory in survivors of chronic interpersonal violence

Minshew, Reese, D'Andrea, Wendy·2015·Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy

Abstract

We investigated the relationship of implicit and explicit memory to a range of symptoms in a sample of 27 women with exposure to chronic interpersonal violence (IPV). Participants viewed the first 3 letters ("stems") of trauma-related, general threat, and neutral words; valenced words were matched with neutral words with the same stem. Free recall and a word-stem completion task were used to test explicit and implicit memory, respectively. Participants exhibited increased implicit memory for trauma-related words as compared with both general threat words and neutral "match" words. They also showed increased explicit memory for both general threat and trauma-related words. Finally, although neither implicit nor explicit memory was correlated with PTSD symptoms, implicit memory for trauma-related words was significantly correlated with symptoms associated with ongoing IPV. Interpersonal sensitivity, hostility, and alexithymia were significantly correlated with implicit, but not explicit, memory for trauma words. Somatization, dissociation, and alexithymia were negatively correlated with explicit, but not implicit, memory for general-threat words. These findings suggest that memory processes in survivors of IPV are closely related to the symptom profile associated with complex trauma. Exploring memory processes in survivors of IPV may lend unique insight into the development and maintenance of the symptom profile associated with IPV.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0036787

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Minshew, R., & D'Andrea, W.
Venue
Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy
Published
2015
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
67-75
ISSN
  • 1942-9681 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-969X
OpenAlex
W2078077508
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
implicit memory, declarative memory, intimate partner violence survivors, complex trauma, posttraumatic stress symptoms, word stem completion, free recall, threat words, alexithymia, interpersonal sensitivity, hostility, somatization, dissociation
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Memory, Psychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Domestic Violence, Survivors, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review