Cited by 113School Choice and PerformanceParental Involvement in EducationReading and Literacy Development

Classmate characteristics and student achievement in 33 countries: Classmates’ past achievement, family socioeconomic status, educational resources, and attitudes toward reading.

Chiu, Ming Ming, Chow, Bonnie Wing-Yin·2015·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

Classmates can influence a student’s academic achievement through immediate interactions (e.g., academic help, positive attitudes toward reading) or by sharing tangible or intangible family resources (books, stories of foreign travel). Multilevel analysis of 141,019 fourth-grade students’ reading achievements in 33 countries showed that classmates’ family factors (parent socioeconomic status [SES], home educational resources) were more strongly related to a student’s reading achievement than were classmates’ characteristics (parent ratings of past literacy skills, attitudes toward reading). However, these classmate links to reading achievement differed across students (e.g., high-SES classmates benefited high-SES students more than low-SES students). Also, links between classmates’ past reading achievement and a student’s current reading achievement were stronger in countries that were richer, were more collectivist, or avoided uncertainty less. These findings show how an ecological model of family and classmate microsystems, classmate family mesosystem, and country macrosystem can help provide a comprehensive account of children’s academic achievement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0036897

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These results are consistent with past studies showing greater sensitivity to classmates' behaviors and past achievement in collectivist cultures.

    “These results are consistent with past studies showing greater sensitivity to classmates' behaviors and past achievement in collectivist cultures (Chiu & Chow, 2015; Chiu etal., 2007).”

    From Students’ Sense of Belonging at School in 41 Countries: Cross-Cultural Variability (2016) · cites this paper as Chiu & Chow, 2015

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 56 · Cited by 113

Authors
Chiu, M. M., & Chow, B. W.-Y.
Affiliations
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2015-02
Volume
107
Issue
1
Pages
152-169
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W1995254237
Cited by
113
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
FWCI
27.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
reading achievement, fourth grade, socioeconomic status, home educational resources, reading attitudes, cross-national comparison, collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, ecological systems theory, peer influence, academic performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review