The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Japanese American reactions to World War II incarceration redress: Just world belief, locus of control, and coping.
Abstract
This study examines second generation (Nisei) Japanese Americans' reactions to government redress for their unjust incarceration during World War II. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to explore the roles of individual difference factors-Belief in a Just World (BJW), Locus of Control (LOC)-and Incarceration-Related Coping in predicting (a) reported redress-related Suffering Relief and (b) Positive Redress Impacts. Findings show that BJW was a stronger predictor of redress reactions than LOC, with higher BJW associated with more affirmative views of redress. In addition, Incarceration-Related Coping mediated a majority of the relationships between the individual difference factors and redress reactions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nisei participants were recruited from camp reunion lists and Sansei participants were recruited primarily from the Japanese American Citizens League organization (JACL), limiting the generalizability of findings.
“Nisei participants were recruited from camp reunion lists and Sansei participants were recruited primarily from the Japanese American Citizens League organization (JACL; see Kim et al., 2014; Nagata, 1993), limiting the generalizability of findings.”
From Processing Cultural Trauma: Intergenerational Effects of the Japanese American Incarceration (2015) · cites this paper as Kim et al., 2014
Citations
Cites
Park, C. L. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018301 · Cited by 3,174
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Processing Cultural Trauma: Intergenerational Effects of the Japanese American Incarceration
Nagata, D. K., Kim, J. H. J., & Nguyen, T. U. (2015) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12115 · Cited by 70
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, J. H. J., Nagata, D. K., & Akiyama, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Diablo Valley College (US)
- ORCID
- Nagata, Donna K.
- Venue
- Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 345-357
- ISSN
- 1077-341X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0106
- 1099-9809
- OpenAlex
- W2331280653
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Michigan
- United States Civil Liberties Public Education Fund
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Asian American and Pacific Histories
- Keywords
- Japanese American incarceration, Nisei, second-generation Japanese Americans, belief in a just world, locus of control, coping, suffering relief, individual differences
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Asian, Culture, Female, Humans, Individuality, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Social Justice, United States, Compensation and Redress, World War II
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
