Cited by 14Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersMemory Processes and Influences

The effect of time of night on wake–dream continuity.

Open access
Malinowski, Josie E., Horton, Caroline L.·2014·Dreaming

Abstract

Research has demonstrated a number of time-of-night and stage-of-sleep differences\nin dream content, such as that dreams from later in the night are longer, more emotional,\nand more bizarre. It was hypothesized that time of night may therefore demonstrate\ndifferences in the continuity of waking life into dreams. Participants (N � 16) were\nsystematically awoken 4 times a night for 2 nights and rated their dreams for wake-\n–dream continuity on a number of dimensions. It was found that time of night affects\nwake–dream continuity overall, particularly showing an increase of bizarreness over\ntime; that there were more references to waking-life media in the early than late night; that\nthere were more references to waking-life activities and objects in the late than early night;\nand that the ways in which different types of wake–dream continuity correlate (such as\ncontinuity with present, past, and future waking life) change from the early to the late\nnight. No stage-of-sleep effects were able to be demonstrated. The results support the\nhypothesis that time of night affects wake–dream continuity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0037817

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 14

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Malinowski, J. E. How and why we dream of waking life: An empirical investigation into the Continuity Hypothesis of dreaming. Unpublished thesis, 2012. Accessible from ethos.bl.uk
  2. McNamara, P., McLaren, D., Smith, D., Brown, A., and Stickgold, R. A ''Jekyll and Hyde'' within: aggressive versus friendly interactions in REM and non-REM dreams. Psychol. Sci., 2005, 16: 130-136.
  3. Schredl, M. Continuity between waking and dreaming: a proposal for a mathematical model. S leep Hypn. , 2002, 5: 26-40.

Authors
Malinowski, J. E., & Horton, C. L.
Affiliations
University of Bedfordshire (GB)
Corresponding author
Malinowski, Josie E.
Venue
Dreaming
Published
2014-12
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
253-269
ISSN
  • 1053-0797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3351
OpenAlex
W2324981329
Cited by
14
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Dreaming (publishedVersion)
  • BGRO - Business, Governance and Religious Organisations Repository (acceptedVersion)
  • UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (acceptedVersion)
  • UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
dream content, dream bizarreness, dream recall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review