Cited by 80Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Neural processing of social participation in borderline personality disorder and social anxiety disorder.

Gutz, Lea, Renneberg, Babette, Roepke, Stefan, Niedeggen, Michael·2015·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD) are known to be highly sensitive to social rejection. Social information processing is assumed to play a key role for this shared psychopathological phenomenon. The first steps in social information processing are to encode social cues and to create a mental representation of the social situation. The aim of the current study was to test whether the perception of social participation in patients with BPD and patients with SAD is biased in this initial stage of social processing. Focus was on the P3b, a brain potential related to stimulus evaluation that has been shown to be a sensitive indicator for the processes of interest. Twenty five unmedicated patients with BPD, 25 unmedicated patients with SAD and 25 healthy controls (HC) played an EEG-compatible version of Cyberball, a virtual ball-tossing paradigm that experimentally induces social inclusion and exclusion. All participants showed a pronounced P3b when excluded. Only patients with BPD showed an enhanced P3b also during the inclusion condition, indicating altered processing of social inclusion. The EEG results for the BPD group were consistent with their self-report data. Patients with BPD felt more excluded during the inclusion condition of Cyberball than both HC and patients with SAD. Furthermore, heightened rejection expectancy (subscale of the Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire) was associated with a smaller differe…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0038614

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People with Borderline Personality Disorder had significantly higher rejection sensitivity than people with social anxiety disorder (d = .7).

    “People with BPD also had significantly higher RS than most clinical groups including people with social anxiety disorder (d = .7;Gutz, Renneberg, Roepke, & Niedeggen, 2015) and people attending outpatient mental health teams with other mental health conditions (d = 1.67;Staebler et al., 2011).”

    From The link between rejection sensitivity and borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as Gutz, Renneberg, Roepke, & Niedeggen, 2015

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 63 · Cited by 80

Authors
Gutz, L., Renneberg, B., Roepke, S., & Niedeggen, M.
Affiliations
Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2015-05
Volume
124
Issue
2
Pages
421-431
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2045710548
Cited by
80
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
FWCI
10.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, social anxiety disorder, social inclusion, social exclusion, P3b, rejection sensitivity, social information processing, Cyberball paradigm, social rejection
MeSH terms
Phobia, Social, Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Psychological Distance, Social Perception, Young Adult, Social Participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review