Disability and diversity on CSU websites: A critical discourse study.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These ideological presuppositions continue to be enshrined in the dominant conceptualization of accessibility and UD while silencing how disability is a dimension of diversity, power, justice and human rights.
“These ideological presuppositions continue to be enshrined in the dominant conceptualization of accessibility and UD while silencing how disability is a dimension of diversity, power, justice and human rights (e.g.Liasidou and Liasidou 2023;Liasidou and Mavrou 2017;Gabel et al. 2016;Waitoller and King Thorius 2016) that necessitate an equity-oriented and critical approach to conceptualizing UD and”
From Accessibility and universal design in higher education curricula: implications for inclusion/exclusion (2025) · cites this paper as Gabel et al. 2016
Cites
Oliver, M. (1990) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-20895-1 · Cited by 4,227 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mavrou, K., Theodorou, E., Mouka, M., & Liasidou, A. (2025) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2025.2507244 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“…silencing how disability is a dimen-sion of diversity, power, justice and human rights (e.g. Liasidou and Liasidou 2023; Liasidou and Mavrou 2017; Gabel et al. 2016; Waitoller and King Thorius 2016) that necessitate an equity-oriented and critical approach to conceptualizing UD and accessibility…”
Campbell-Meier, J., & Velasquez, D. (2025) · Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association · doi:10.1080/24750158.2025.2522472 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gabel, S. L., Reid, D., Pearson, H., Ruiz, L., & Hume-Dawson, R.
- Affiliations
- Wayne State University (US)
- Biola University (US)
- Chapman University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Diversity in Higher Education
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-80
- ISSN
- 1938-8926 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-8934
- OpenAlex
- W2577696556
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 8.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Diversity in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Keywords
- disability, diversity, California State University, university websites, accessibility, inclusive language, higher education, critical discourse analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
