Difficulties with being socially accepted: An experimental study in borderline personality disorder.
Abstract
Anxious preoccupation with real or imagined abandonment is a key feature of borderline personality disorder (BPD). Recent experimental research suggests that patients with BPD do not simply show emotional overreactivity to rejection. Instead, they experience reduced connectedness with others in situations of social inclusion. Resulting consequences of these features on social behavior are not investigated yet. The aim of the present study was to investigate the differential impact of social acceptance and rejection on social expectations and subsequent social behavior in BPD. To this end, we developed the Mannheim Virtual Group Interaction Paradigm in which participants interacted with a group of computer-controlled avatars. They were led to believe that these represented real human coplayers. During these interactions, participants introduced themselves, evaluated their coplayers, assessed their social expectations and received feedback signaling either acceptance or rejection by the alleged other participants. Subsequently, participants played a modified trust game, which measured cooperative and aggressive behavior. Fifty-six nonmedicated BPD patients and 56 healthy control participants were randomly and double-blindly assigned to either the group-acceptance or group-rejection condition. BPD patients showed lower initial expectations of being socially accepted than healthy controls. After repeated presentation of social feedback, they adjusted their expectations in response to negative, but not to positive feedback. After the experience of social acceptance, BPD patients behaved less cooperatively. These experimental findings point to a clinically relevant issue in BPD: Altered cognitive and behavioral responses to social acceptance may hamper the forming of stable cooperative relationships and negatively affect future interpersonal relationships. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two studies did not find a significant effect in five different community samples and a clinical sample, though the effect size remained small to moderate (r = .16-.35).
“Two studies did not find a significant effect in five different community samples and a clinical sample, though the effect size remained small to moderate (r = .16-.35; Brown, 2014;Liebke et al, 2018).”
From The link between rejection sensitivity and borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as Liebke et al, 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Foxhall, M., Hamilton‐Giachritsis, C., & Button, K. (2019) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjc.12216 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Kube, T., Rozenkrantz, L., Rief, W., & Barsky, A. (2020) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101829 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liebke, L., Koppe, G., Bungert, M., Thome, J., Hauschild, S., Defiebre, N., Izurieta Hidalgo, N. A., Schmahl, C., Bohus, M., & Lis, S.
- Affiliations
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 670-682
- ISSN
- 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1846
- OpenAlex
- W2886446744
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8
- FWCI
- 9.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- German Research Foundation (KFO 256; BO 1487/11–1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- borderline personality disorder, social acceptance, social rejection, social expectations, social connectedness, trust game, cooperative behavior, aggression, interpersonal relationships
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Psychological Distance, Trust, Young Adult, Social Participation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review