Leadership emergence: An integrative review
Abstract
Despite significant scholarly attention and practical importance regarding who emerges as informal and formal leaders in organizations, an integrative framework of the leadership emergence literature remains elusive. The presence of such a framework proves integral for the advancement of work in this area due to the complexity of the field, coupled with its sprawling nature across multiple disciplines (e.g., management, communication, education, economics). Accordingly, in this review, we utilize a database of 270 primary studies to put forth a distal-proximal framework of leadership emergence. In particular, we systematically review past research to answer four questions: (1) what do we know about the phenomenon of leadership emergence itself, (2) what are the antecedents of leadership emergence, (3) what outcomes are associated with leader emergence, and (4) what are the boundary conditions of leadership emergence? By introducing a conceptual framework for informal and formal emergent leadership, we highlight areas of research maturity and nascency and offer several recommendations for future work in this domain. Altogether, we highlight broad theoretical implications for the leadership, teams, and individual differences literature-and elaborate upon several benefits that an integrated framework of emergent leadership provides for organizations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The practices of using managerial samples to study leadership potentially overlook how leadership can manifest outside of the formal designation, such as emergent leadership.
“However, this is insufficient, if not inconsistent, because these practices potentially overlook how leadership can manifest outside of the formal designation (e.g., emergent leadership; Badura et al., 2022).”
From The evolution of leadership: Past insights, present trends, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as Badura et al., 2022
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The evolution of leadership: Past insights, present trends, and future directions
Liden, R. C., Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115036 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Being a Parent Helps Being a Benevolent Leader: A Mixed-Method Approach
Liu, Z., Liang, Z., Wang, C., & Bian, W. (2025) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-024-05757-1 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Badura, K. L., Galvin, B. M., & Lee, M. Y.
- Affiliations
- Marriott International (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2022-11
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2069-2100
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W4200492409
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 15.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Keywords
- leadership emergence, informal leadership, formal leadership, boundary conditions, teams, individual differences, integrative framework
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Leadership
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review