Profile reliability of cognitive ability subscores in a referred sample.
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Empirical evidence to date that unique pattern configurations among subscores on intelligence tests such as the WISC-V are stable long-term is nascent.
“the nascent empirical evidence to date that any unique pattern configuration among subscores on intelligence tests such as the WISC -V are stable long -term must also be considered (Styck et al. 2019).”
From Beyond Primary Assessment on the WISC-V: An Investigation of the Structural Validity of the Ancillary Scores (2025) · cites this paper as Styck et al. 2019
Cites
Watkins, M. W. (2010) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0020043 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationCanivez, G. L. (2014) · School Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1037/spq0000032 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Watkins, M. W., Canivez, G. L., Dombrowski, S. C., McGill, R. J., Pritchard, A. E., Holingue, C. B., & Jacobson, L. A. (2022) · Applied Neuropsychology: Child · doi:10.1080/21622965.2021.1875827 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“Within such a framework, score profiles are seen as more useful for interpretation than the scores themselves because they focus on within-person performance in contrast to the between-person performance emphasized by the nomothetic approach (Styck et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationMcGill, R. J., Dombrowski, S. C., & Canivez, G. L. (2025) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.23457 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“V are stable long ‐ term must also be considered (Styck et al. 2019).”
- Authors
- Styck, K. M., Beaujean, A. A., & Watkins, M. W.
- Venue
- Archives of Scientific Psychology
- Published
- 2019-12-23
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-128
- ISSN
- 2169-3269 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2998003150
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Archives of Scientific Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- test-retest reliability, cognitive ability testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
