Cited by 114Sleep and related disordersMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The SENSE study: Post intervention effects of a randomized controlled trial of a cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness-based group sleep improvement intervention among at-risk adolescents

Open access
Blake, Matthew, Waloszek, Joanna M., Schwartz, Orli, Raniti, Monika, Simmons, Julian G., Blake, Laura, Murray, Greg, Dahl, Ronald E. +4 more·2016·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sleep problems are a major risk factor for the emergence of mental health problems in adolescence. The aim of this study was to investigate the post intervention effects of a cognitive-behavioral/mindfulness-based group sleep intervention on sleep and mental health among at-risk adolescents. METHOD: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted across High schools in Melbourne, Australia. One hundred forty-four adolescents (aged 12-17 years) with high levels of anxiety and sleeping difficulties, but without past or current depressive disorder, were randomized into either a sleep improvement intervention or an active control 'study skills' intervention. Both programs consisted of 7 90-min-long group sessions delivered over 7 weeks. One hundred twenty-three participants began the interventions (female = 60%; mean age = 14.48, SD = 0.95), with 60 in the sleep condition and 63 in the control condition. All participants were required to complete a battery of mood and sleep questionnaires, 7 days of wrist actigraphy (an objective measure of sleep), and sleep diary entry at pre- and-post intervention. RESULTS: The sleep intervention condition was associated with significantly greater improvements in subjective sleep (global sleep quality [with a medium effect size], sleep onset latency, daytime sleepiness [with small effect sizes]), objective sleep (sleep onset latency [with a medium effect size]), and anxiety (with a small effect size) compared with the control intervention condition. CONCLUSION: The SENSE study provides evidence that a multicomponent group sleep intervention that includes cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness-based therapies can reduce sleep initiation problems and related daytime dysfunction, along with concomitant anxiety symptoms, among at-risk adolescents. (PsycINFO Database Record

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ccp0000142

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a youth study, a face-to-face insomnia intervention delivered to secondary school students improved sleep and anxiety outcomes but not symptoms of depression.

    “In a youth study, a face-to-face insomnia intervention was delivered to secondary school students and results showed improvements on sleep and anxiety outcomes, but not symptoms of depression.13”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 82 · Cited by 114

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Merrigan, J., Buysse, D., Bird, J., & Livingston, E. (2013). Insomnia. Journal of the American Medical Association, 309.

Authors
Blake, M., Waloszek, J. M., Schwartz, O., Raniti, M., Simmons, J. G., Blake, L., Murray, G., Dahl, R. E., Bootzin, R., Dudgeon, P., Trinder, J., & Allen, N. B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2016-12
Volume
84
Issue
12
Pages
1039-1051
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2533762129
Cited by
114
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7
FWCI
15.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1027076)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
sleep disorders, adolescents, cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based interventions, group intervention, sleep latency, daytime sleepiness, anxiety, sleep quality, at-risk youth, wrist actigraphy, school-based intervention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Child, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Psychotherapy, Group, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review