Economic evaluation of an online single-session intervention for depression in Kenyan adolescents.
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the costs and cost-effectiveness of Shamiri-Digital , an online single-session intervention (SSI) for depression among Kenyan adolescents. Method: Data were drawn from a randomized clinical trial with n = 103 Kenyan high school students (64% female, M age = 15.5). All students were eligible to participate, regardless of baseline depression symptomatology. We estimated delivery costs in 2020 U.S. dollars from multiple perspectives. To account for uncertainty, we performed sensitivity analyses with different cost assumptions and definitions of effectiveness. Using number needed to treat (NNT) estimates, we also evaluated the cost required to achieve a clinically meaningful reduction in depressive symptoms. Results: In the base-case (the most realistic cost estimate), it costs U.S. $3.57 per student to deliver Shamiri-Digital . Depending on the definition of clinically meaningful improvement, 7.1-9.7 students needed to receive the intervention for one student to experience a clinically meaningful improvement, which translated to a cost of U.S. $25.35 to U.S. $34.62 per student. Under a worst-case scenario (i.e., assuming the highest treatment cost and the strictest effectiveness definition), the cost to achieve clinically meaningful improvement was U.S. $92.05 per student. Conclusions: Shamiri-Digital is a low-cost intervention for reducing depression symptomatology. The public health benefit of empirically supported SSIs is especially important in low-inc…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The online approach can reduce the possibility of infection caused by person-to-person contact and the cost of the client's access to services.
“The online approach can reduce the possibility of infection caused by person-toperson contact and the cost of the client ' s access to services (Rauschenberg et al., 2021; Wasil et al., 2021).”
From The Online Strength-Informed Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Among COVID-19-Affected Adolescents. (2022) · cites this paper as Wasil et al., 2021
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 56 · Cited by 20
- Authors
- Wasil, A. R., Kacmarek, C. N., Osborn, T. L., Palermo, E. H., DeRubeis, R. J., Weisz, J. R., & Yates, B. T.
- Affiliations
- American University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wasil, Akash R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 657-667
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- OpenAlex
- W3160080295
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 3.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- depression, adolescents, online intervention, single-session intervention, economic evaluation, cost-effectiveness, Kenya
- MeSH terms
- Internet-Based Intervention, Adolescent, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Depression, Female, Humans, Kenya, Male, Students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review