Cited by 84Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial and Intergroup PsychologyChild and Animal Learning Development

Is gender more important and meaningful than race? An analysis of racial and gender identity among Black, White, and mixed-race children.

Open access
Rogers, Leoandra Onnie, Meltzoff, Andrew N.·2017·Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology

Abstract

Objectives Social categories shape children's lives in subtle and powerful ways. Although research has assessed children's knowledge of social groups, most prominently race and gender, few studies have examined children's understanding of their own multiple social identities and how they intersect. This paper explores how children evaluate the importance and meaning of their racial and gender identities, and variation in these evaluations based on the child's own age, gender, and race. Method Participants were 222 Black, White, and Mixed-Race children (girls: n = 136; Mage = 9.94 years). Data were gathered in schools via 1-on-1 semistructured interviews. Analyses focused on specific measures of the importance and meaning of racial and gender identity for children. Results We found that: (a) children rate gender as a more important identity than race; (b) the meanings children ascribe to gender identity emphasized inequality and group difference whereas the meaning of race emphasized physical appearance and humanism/equality; and (c) children's assessments of importance and meaning varied as a function of child race and gender, but not age. Conclusion The findings extend research on young children's social identity development and the role of culture and context in children's emerging racial and gender identities. Implications for identity theory and development and intergroup relations are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cdp0000125

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Rogers, L. O., & Meltzoff, A. N.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology
Published
2017-07
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
323-334
ISSN
  • 1077-341X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0106
  • 1099-9809
OpenAlex
W2531710197
Cited by
84
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
14.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (SMA-1303753)
  • Spencer Foundation/National Academy of Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
racial identity, gender identity, social identity development, intersectionality, mixed-race children, Black children, white children, intergroup relations, identity theory, children's social cognition
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Social Identification, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review