Cited by 366Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismCognitive Abilities and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of bilingualism and computer video game experience on the Simon task.

Bialystok, Ellen·2006·Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale

Abstract

A group of 97 participants who were monolingual or bilingual and who had extensive practice playing computer video games or not completed two Simon tasks. The tasks were presented in two conditions that manipulated the number of response switches required in each block of trials. Bilingualism and video-game experience each influenced a different aspect of performance: Video-game players were faster in most conditions, including control conditions that did not include conflict from irrelevant position; bilinguals were faster only in a condition that required the most controlled attention to resolve conflict from the position and the stimulus. The results show the potential of experience to modify performance and point to subtle processing differences in various versions of the Simon task.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cjep2006008

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 33 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 365

Metadata

Authors
Bialystok, E.
Affiliations
York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Bialystok, Ellen
Venue
Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale
Published
2006-03
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
68-79
ISSN
  • 1196-1961 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-7290
OpenAlex
W2005067186
Cited by
366
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
bilingualism, Simon task, response inhibition, attentional control, cognitive flexibility, response switching, stimulus-response conflict
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Conflict, Psychological, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Memory, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Statistics, Nonparametric, Video Games, Multilingualism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review