Thought characteristics in patients with severe health anxiety: A comparison with obsessive–compulsive disorder and healthy controls.
Open accessAbstract
Previous studies on health anxiety have primarily focused on general aspects of thought characteristics proposed to be central to the disorder, whereas the importance of disorderspecific thought content is often stressed in the literature. The present study examines general as well as disorder-specific aspects of several thought characteristics in 32 patients with severe health anxiety, a clinical control group of 33 patients with obsessive– compulsive disorder, and 32 healthy control participants. Both patient groups reported more general rumination, intolerance of uncertainty, thought suppression, and healthrelated involuntary autobiographical memories and future thoughts than the healthy control participants. Patients with severe health anxiety reported more health-related rumination and health-related intolerance of uncertainty than general rumination and general intolerance of uncertainty, whereas the other groups showed the opposite pattern. The findings lend support to the view that health-related rumination and health-related intolerance of uncertainty play a central role in the disorder.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 9
- Authors
- Gehrt, T. B., Frostholm, L., Obermann, M.-L., & Berntsen, D.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Gehrt, Tine B.
- Venue
- Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice
- Published
- 2023-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76-87
- ISSN
- 2326-5523 (ISSN-L)
- 2326-5531
- OpenAlex
- W4293101656
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pure.au.dk
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF89)
- Independent Research Fund (9037-00015B9)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Keywords
- health anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder, rumination, intolerance of uncertainty, thought suppression, involuntary autobiographical memories, thought content
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review