The DOI matches its Crossref record.
National Science Education Standards: (302882005-001)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research
Sadler, T. D. (2004) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20009 · Cited by 1,440
Advancing engineering education in P–12 classrooms
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x · Cited by 910
Sawada, D., Piburn, M. D., Judson, E., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., & Bloom, I. (2002) · School Science and Mathematics · doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb17883.x · Cited by 564
Co‐constructing inquiry‐based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform
Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.1023 · Cited by 555
Nadelson, L. S., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., Dance, M., & Pfiester, J. (2013) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2012.667014 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- The National Academy of Sciences; The Center for Education
- Venue
- PsycEXTRA Dataset
- Publisher
- Unmaintained records
- Published
- 1996
- OpenAlex
- W4248839109
- Cited by
- 1,555
- References
- 0
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: National Science Education Standards: (302882005-001). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/e302882005-001
- The paper
- The National Academy of Sciences; The Center for Education. (1996). National Science Education Standards: (302882005-001). PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e302882005-001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
