The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Sexual Victimization of College Women: (377652004-001)
Abstract
The National College Women Sexual Victimization (NCVS) study attempted to build on and surmount the limitations of existing research on the sexual victimization of college students. In addition to the study of sexual victimization, the study investigated how rape estimates that use the two-stage process of behaviorally specific questions and incident reports compared with estimates drawn from survey responses. The study results were based on a telephone survey of a randomly selected national sample of 4,446 college women in 1996. Twelve types of sexual victimization, from completed rape through stalking and verbal forms of sexual victimization, were studied. Survey responses suggest that many students encounter sexist and harassing comments and that many have a good chance of being stalked or enduring some form of coerced sexual contact. During any given academic year, 2.8% of women will experience a completed or attempted rape. Study results also show that a methodology that uses behaviorally specific screen questions in combination with an incident report yields considerably higher estimates of completed, attempted, and threatened rape than are found using the telephone methodology of NCVS. Most sexual victimization occurred when college women were alone with a man they know, at night, and in the privacy of a residence. Several factors appeared to increase the likelihood of being victimized. (Contains 14 exhibits and 37 endnotes.) (SLD) ENTIRE DOCUMENT. POOR PRINT QUALITY Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRIME IN THE IVORY TOWER: THE LEVEL AND SOURCES OF STUDENT VICTIMIZATION*
FISHER, B. S., SLOAN, J. J., CULLEN, F. T., & LU, C. (1998) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01262.x · Cited by 359
Self-citationThe Under detection of Rape: Methodological Choices Influence Incidence Estimates
Koss, M. P. (1992) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01157.x · Cited by 297
Cited by
Sexual assault victimization and psychopathology: A review and meta-analysis
Dworkin, E. R., Menon, S. V., Bystrynski, J., & Allen, N. E. (2017) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.06.002 · Cited by 825
Fisher, B. S., Daigle, L. E., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. (2003) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854802239161 · Cited by 808
Self-citation(2011) · Cited by 773
HTUN, M., & WELDON, S. L. (2012) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055412000226 · Cited by 652
Correlates of rape while intoxicated in a national sample of college women.
Mohler-Kuo, M., Dowdall, G. W., Koss, M. P., & Wechsler, H. (2004) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol · doi:10.15288/jsa.2004.65.37 · Cited by 537
Metadata
- Authors
- Fisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G.
- Venue
- PsycEXTRA Dataset
- Publisher
- Unmaintained records
- Published
- 2000
- OpenAlex
- W2487245598
- Cited by
- 1,312
- References
- 2
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Sexual Victimization of College Women: (377652004-001). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/e377652004-001
- The paper
- Fisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. (2000). The Sexual Victimization of College Women: (377652004-001). PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e377652004-001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.