The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Update on overall prevalence of major birth defects - Atlanta, Georgia, 1978-2005: (403792008-002)
Abstract
Major structural or genetic birth defects affect approximately 3% of births in the United States, are a major contributor to infant mortality, and result in billions of dollars in costs for care. Although the causes of most major birth defects are unknown, concerns have been raised that certain factors, such as an increase in the prevalence of diabetes among women, might result in increased prevalence of birth defects over time. This report updates previously published data from the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP), the oldest population-based birth defects surveillance system in the United States with active case ascertainment. For the period 1978-2005, CDC assessed the overall prevalence of major birth defects and their frequency relative to selected maternal and infant characteristics. The MACDP results indicated that the prevalence of major birth defects in metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia, remained stable during 1978-2005 but varied by maternal age and race/ethnicity, birthweight, and gestational age. Tracking the overall prevalence of major birth defects can identify subgroups that are affected disproportionately; additional measures focused on these subgroups might improve preconception care and care during pregnancy to prevent birth defects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
WRITING GROUP MEMBERS, Lloyd-Jones, D., Adams, R., Carnethon, M., De Simone, G., Ferguson, T. B., Flegal, K., Ford, E., Furie, K., Go, A., et al. (2009) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.191261 · Cited by 3,140
Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons
Shimabukuro, T. T., Kim, S. Y., Myers, T. R., Moro, P. L., Oduyebo, T., Panagiotakopoulos, L., Marquez, P. L., Olson, C. K., Liu, R., Chang, K. T., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2104983 · Cited by 927
Female Obesity and Infertility
Talmor, A., & Dunphy, B. (2015) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.10.014 · Cited by 320
Safety of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Other Second-Line Antidiabetics in Early Pregnancy
Cesta, C. E., Rotem, R., Bateman, B. T., Chodick, G., Cohen, J. M., Furu, K., Gissler, M., Huybrechts, K. F., Kjerpeseth, L. J., Leinonen, M. K., et al. (2024) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.6663 · Cited by 200
Antidepressant use in pregnancy: a critical review focused on risks and controversies
Byatt, N., Deligiannidis, K. M., & Freeman, M. P. (2013) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/acps.12042 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Venue
- PsycEXTRA Dataset
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-5
- OpenAlex
- W4239166088
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 0
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Update on overall prevalence of major birth defects - Atlanta, Georgia, 1978-2005: (403792008-002). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/e403792008-002
- The paper
- Update on overall prevalence of major birth defects - Atlanta, Georgia, 1978-2005: (403792008-002). (2008). PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e403792008-002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.