The DOI matches its Crossref record.
School-Based Behavioral Intervention for Social Anxiety Disorder in Adolescents: Results of an Attention Control Trial and Implementation Issues
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transparent communication often facilitates informed decision-making and can enhance adherence to medication.
“Transparent communication often facilitates informed decision-making and can enhance adherence to medication [94].”
From The risks versus the benefits of pharmacological intervention in social anxiety disorder in children (2025) · cites this paper as [94]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Perihan, C., Burke, M., Bowman-Perrott, L., Bicer, A., Gallup, J., Thompson, J., & Sallese, M. (2020) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-019-03949-7 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Warner, C. M., Warner, C. M., Fisher, P. H., & Klein, R. G.
- Venue
- PsycEXTRA Dataset
- Published
- 2006
- OpenAlex
- W4214900602
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PsycEXTRA Dataset (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › School Health and Nursing Education
- Keywords
- social anxiety disorder, adolescents, school-based intervention, behavioral interventions, implementation issues, school-based mental health services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
