The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pertussis Vaccination: Use of Acellular Pertussis Vaccines Among Infants and Young Children: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP): (547522006-001)
Abstract
Concerns about the safety of whole-cell pertussis vaccines prompted development of acellular vaccines that are less likely to provoke adverse events because they contain purified antigenic components of Bordetella pertussis. Two diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccines--ACEL-IMUNE and Tripedia--have been licensed for several years, but (until recently) only for administration of the fourth and fifth doses in the series to children aged 15 months-6 years who previously had received three or more doses of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and whole-cell pertussis (DTP) vaccine. Published reports indicate that, when administered to infants aged 2, 4, and 6 months, acellular pertussis vaccines are effective in preventing pertussis disease and associated with fewer local, systemic, and certain more serious adverse events than whole-cell pertussis vaccines. On the basis of these data, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has licensed three DTaP vaccines for use among children aged 6 weeks-6 years. Tripedia is now licensed for the initial four doses, and ACEL-IMUNE for all five doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccination series. A third DtaP vaccine (Infanix) was licensed in January 1997 for the initial four doses of the series. Tripedia, ACEL-IMUNE, and Infanix are now recommended for routine vaccination of infants and young children, although whole-cell pertussis vaccines remain acceptable alternatives. Tripedia, ACEL-IMUNE, and Infanix are recommended for all remaining doses in the schedule for children who have started the vaccination series with one, two, three, or four doses of whole-cell pertussis vaccines. In September 1996, FDA licensed the use of TriHIBit (ActHIB reconstituted with Tripedia) for the fourth dose in the series of vaccinations against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, and Haemophilus influenzae type b disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Liang, J. L., Tiwari, T., Moro, P., Messonnier, N. E., Reingold, A., Sawyer, M., & Clark, T. A. (2018) · MMWR. Recommendations and Reports · doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr6702a1 · Cited by 457
Pertussis: Microbiology, Disease, Treatment, and Prevention
Kilgore, P. E., Salim, A. M., Zervos, M. J., & Schmitt, H.-J. (2016) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00083-15 · Cited by 434
Infant Pertussis: Who Was the Source?
Bisgard, K. M., Pascual, F. B., Ehresmann, K. R., Miller, C. A., Cianfrini, C., Jennings, C. E., Rebmann, C. A., Gabel, J., Schauer, S. L., & Lett, S. M. (2004) · The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal · doi:10.1097/01.inf.0000145263.37198.2b · Cited by 403
Geospatial analysis of nonmedical vaccine exemptions and pertussis outbreaks in the United States
Aloe, C., Kulldorff, M., & Bloom, B. R. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1700240114 · Cited by 51
Moro, P. L., Arana, J., Marquez, P. L., Ng, C., Barash, F., Hibbs, B. F., & Cano, M. (2019) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.04.088 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Venue
- PsycEXTRA Dataset
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- RR-7
- Pages
- 1-25
- OpenAlex
- W2613142776
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pertussis Vaccination: Use of Acellular Pertussis Vaccines Among Infants and Young Children: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP): (547522006-001). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/e547522006-001
- The paper
- Pertussis Vaccination: Use of Acellular Pertussis Vaccines Among Infants and Young Children: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP): (547522006-001). (1997). PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e547522006-001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.