The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The EQUIP Program: Teaching youth to think and act responsibly through a peer helping approach: (552692012-085)
Abstract
A three-part intervention method for working with antisocial or behavior disordered adolescents. The approach includes training in moral judgment, anger management/correction of thinking errors, and prosocial skills. Youth involved in the EQUIP training program participate in two types of group sessions - Equipment Meetings (in which the leader teaches specific skills) and Mutual Help Meetings (in which the leader coaches students as they use the skills they've learned to help each other). The EQUIP program received the 1998 Reclaiming Children and Youth Spotlight on Excellence Award. In addition to being widely used in the U.S., EQUIP has been adapted for use in Canada, the Netherlands, and several other countries. Program Evaluation In an evaluation of the program, 57 boys between the ages of 15 and 18 who were recently committed to a juvenile corrections facility were randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1) The experimental EQUIP treatment group, 2) the motivational control group, or 3) the simple control group. Results indicated that participants in the EQUIP group experienced significant decreases in self- and staff-reported institutional misconduct as well as gains in social skills, whereas participants in either control group did not. There were no differences between groups in regards to changes in moral judgment.Leeman, L.W., Gibbs, J.C., & Fuller, D. (1993). Evaluation of a multi-component group treatment program for juvenile delinquents. Aggressive Behavior, 19, 281-292.UpdatesSince its introduction in the early 1990s, the EQUIP Program has been adapted and implemented at various facilities and institutions in North America, Europe, and Australia. The institutions include juvenile correctional facilities, community-based adult correctional facilities, halfway houses, re-entry programs, and middle schools. The young persons served have ranged in age from preadolescence through adulthood.One example is the Minnesota Correctional Facility in Red Wing, which provides treatment, education, and transition services for chronic male juvenile offenders. After implementing and adapting EQUIP, Red Wing saw its recidivism rate drop by better than half (from 53% to 21%; see Gibbs, Potter, DiBiase and Devlin, in press).Book ReviewsFor the first time, 'what we know' and 'what we know works' have been distilled into a highly readable, scientifically proven intervention program for antisocial youth.--Laurie Rice, Journal for Juvenile Justice and Detention ServicesThe EQUIP Program is a must read...Gibbs and colleagues provide the reader with a succinct but clear conceptual understanding of the causes of antisocial behavior, cognitive treatment strategies, and methods to empirically validate the effectiveness of interventions.--John Lemmon, Juvenile Justice UpdateThe beauty of this book is its organization and practicality...The EQUIP Program is realistic and would be beneficial for teachers, principals, counselors, social workers, psychologists, and those interested in making a positive impact on youth.--Carol A. Yeager, The Peer Facilitator Quarterly
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What Have We Learned from Five Decades of Neutralization Research?
Maruna, S., & Copes, H. (2005) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/655355 · Cited by 771
Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.20336 · Cited by 538
A fundamental attribution error? Rethinking cognitive distortions †
Maruna, S., & Mann, R. E. (2006) · Legal and Criminological Psychology · doi:10.1348/135532506x114608 · Cited by 465
Paciello, M., Fida, R., Cerniglia, L., Tramontano, C., & Cole, E. (2013) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.004 · Cited by 214
Dougherty, D. D., Rauch, S. L., Deckersbach, T., Marci, C., Loh, R., Shin, L. M., Alpert, N. M., Fischman, A. J., & Fava, M. (2004) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.61.8.795 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Gibbs, J. C., Potter, G. B., & Goldstein, A. P.
- Venue
- PsycEXTRA Dataset
- Published
- 1998
- OpenAlex
- W2124212437
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The EQUIP Program: Teaching youth to think and act responsibly through a peer helping approach: (552692012-085). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/e552692012-085
- The paper
- Gibbs, J. C., Potter, G. B., & Goldstein, A. P. (1998). The EQUIP Program: Teaching youth to think and act responsibly through a peer helping approach: (552692012-085). PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e552692012-085
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.