The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Older Adults' Needs for Home Health Care and the Potential for Human Factors Interventions: (578452012-019)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This work could serve as an example to support the promising future of AI-mediated healthcare communication.
“This work could serve as an example to support the promising future of AI-mediated healthcare communication [53,79].”
From Talk2Care: An LLM-based Voice Assistant for Communication between Healthcare Providers and Older Adults (2024) · cites this paper as [79]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yang, Z., Xu, X., Yao, B., Rogers, E., Zhang, S., Intille, S., Shara, N., Gao, G. G., & Wang, D. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3659625 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitzner, T. L., Beer, J. M., McBride, S. E., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D.
- Venue
- PsycEXTRA Dataset
- Published
- 2009
- OpenAlex
- W4229979157
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 1
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PsycEXTRA Dataset (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
- Keywords
- older adults, home health care, needs assessment, aging in place, assistive technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
