The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent Trends in Cesarean Delivery in the United States: (665412010-001)
Abstract
KEY FINDINGS: Data from the Natality Data File, National Vital Statistics System. The cesarean rate rose by 53% from 1996 to 2007, reaching 32%, the highest rate ever reported in the United States. From 1996 to 2007, the cesarean rate increased for mothers in all age and racial and Hispanic origin groups. The pace of the increase accelerated from 2000 to 2007. Cesarean rates also increased for infants at all gestational ages; from 1996 to 2006 preterm infants had the highest rates. Cesarean rates increased for births to mothers in all U.S. states, and by more than 70% in six states from 1996 to 2007.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Births: preliminary data for 2012.
Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., & Ventura, S. J. (2013) · PubMed · Cited by 1,509
Self-citationMartin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Ventura, S. J., Menacker, F., & Park, M. M. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 892
Self-citationMartin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Ventura, S. J., Menacker, F., Park, M. M., & Sutton, P. D. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 855
Self-citationYang, Q., Wen, S., Oppenheimer, L. W., Chen, X., Black, D., Gao, J., & Walker, M. (2007) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01295.x · Cited by 117
Neonatal outcomes with caesarean delivery at term
Liston, F. A., Allen, V. M., O’Connell, C. M., & Jangaard, K. A. (2007) · Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal · doi:10.1136/adc.2006.112565 · Cited by 81
Murthy, K., Grobman, W. A., Lee, T. A., & Holl, J. L. (2007) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000287294.89148.23 · Cited by 69
Severe Obstetric Morbidity in the United States: 1998-2005
Kuklina, E. V., Meikle, S., Jamieson, D. J., et al. (2010) · Obstetric Anesthesia Digest · doi:10.1097/01.aoa.0000367013.78631.87 · Cited by 27
The Ethical Debate of Maternal Choice and Autonomy in Cesarean Delivery
Williams, H. O. (2008) · Clinics in Perinatology · doi:10.1016/j.clp.2008.03.011 · Cited by 22
Cited by
Media Influences on Social Outcomes: The Impact of MTV’s 16 and Pregnant on Teen Childbearing
Kearney, M. S., & Levine, P. B. (2015) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20140012 · Cited by 316
Huh, S. Y., Rifas-Shiman, S. L., Zera, C. A., Edwards, J. W. R., Oken, E., Weiss, S. T., & Gillman, M. W. (2012) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-301141 · Cited by 293
Werner, E. F., Pettker, C. M., Zuckerwise, L., Reel, M., Funai, E. F., Henderson, J., & Thung, S. F. (2012) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc11-1643 · Cited by 182
Creanga, A. A., Bateman, B. T., Butwick, A. J., Raleigh, L., Maeda, A., Kuklina, E., & Callaghan, W. M. (2015) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.002 · Cited by 130
Predicting acute pain after cesarean delivery using three simple questions
Pan, P. H., Tonidandel, A. M., Aschenbrenner, C. A., Houle, T. T., Harris, L. C., & Eisenach, J. C. (2013) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e31828e156f · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Menacker, F., & Hamilton, B. E.
- Venue
- PsycEXTRA Dataset
- Published
- 2010
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 1-8
- OpenAlex
- W2182975032
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 8
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent Trends in Cesarean Delivery in the United States: (665412010-001). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/e665412010-001
- The paper
- Menacker, F., & Hamilton, B. E. (2010). Recent Trends in Cesarean Delivery in the United States: (665412010-001). PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e665412010-001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.