High poverty schools and the distribution of teachers and principals: (722752011-001)
Abstract
Although many factors combine to make a successful school, most people agree that quality teachers and school principals are among the most important requirements for success, especially when success is defined by the ability of the school to raise the achievement of its students.The central question for this study is how the quality of the teachers and principals in high-poverty schools in North Carolina compares to that in the schools serving more advantaged students.A related question is why these differences emerge.The consistency of the patterns across many measures of qualifications for both teachers and principals leaves no doubt that students in the high-poverty schools are served by school personnel with lower qualifications than those in the lower poverty schools.Moreover, in many cases the differences are large.Additional evidence documents that the differences largely reflect predictable outcomes of the labor market for teachers and principals.Hence, active policy interventions are needed to counter these forces if the ultimate goal is to provide equal educational opportunity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In some education systems, schools serving the least well-served students have the least experienced and qualified teachers, least stable school leadership, poorest facilities, and circumstances that make it very difficult for parents and communities to authentically partner with their children's schools.
“In some education systems, schools serving the least well-served students find themselves with the least experienced and qualified teachers [63], the least stable school leadership [64], the poorest facilities [65], and circumstances that make it very difficult for both parents and communities to authentically partner with their children's schools [21].”
From A Review of Evidence about Equitable School Leadership (2021) · cites this paper as [64]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 10 · Cited by 262
- Authors
- Clotfelter, C., Ladd, H. F., Vigdor, J., & Wheeler, J.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- ORCID
- Clotfelter, Charles
- Venue
- PsycEXTRA Dataset
- Publisher
- Unmaintained records
- Published
- 2007
- OpenAlex
- W2160607124
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PsycEXTRA Dataset (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
- Social Sciences › Education › Education in Rural Contexts
- Keywords
- high-poverty schools, teacher quality, principal qualities, teacher qualifications, school principals, teacher labor market, educational inequality, equal educational opportunity, academic performance, North Carolina
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review