Cited by 262School Choice and PerformanceTeacher Professional Development and MotivationEducation in Rural Contexts

High poverty schools and the distribution of teachers and principals: (722752011-001)

Clotfelter, Charles, Ladd, Helen F., Vigdor, Jacob, Wheeler, Justin·2007·PsycEXTRA Dataset

Abstract

Although many factors combine to make a successful school, most people agree that quality teachers and school principals are among the most important requirements for success, especially when success is defined by the ability of the school to raise the achievement of its students.The central question for this study is how the quality of the teachers and principals in high-poverty schools in North Carolina compares to that in the schools serving more advantaged students.A related question is why these differences emerge.The consistency of the patterns across many measures of qualifications for both teachers and principals leaves no doubt that students in the high-poverty schools are served by school personnel with lower qualifications than those in the lower poverty schools.Moreover, in many cases the differences are large.Additional evidence documents that the differences largely reflect predictable outcomes of the labor market for teachers and principals.Hence, active policy interventions are needed to counter these forces if the ultimate goal is to provide equal educational opportunity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/e722752011-001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In some education systems, schools serving the least well-served students have the least experienced and qualified teachers, least stable school leadership, poorest facilities, and circumstances that make it very difficult for parents and communities to authentically partner with their children's schools.

    “In some education systems, schools serving the least well-served students find themselves with the least experienced and qualified teachers [63], the least stable school leadership [64], the poorest facilities [65], and circumstances that make it very difficult for both parents and communities to authentically partner with their children's schools [21].”

    From A Review of Evidence about Equitable School Leadership (2021) · cites this paper as [64]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 10 · Cited by 262

Authors
Clotfelter, C., Ladd, H. F., Vigdor, J., & Wheeler, J.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Venue
PsycEXTRA Dataset
Published
2007
OpenAlex
W2160607124
Cited by
262
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
Type
dataset
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
PsycEXTRA Dataset (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education in Rural Contexts
Keywords
high-poverty schools, teacher quality, principal qualities, teacher qualifications, school principals, teacher labor market, educational inequality, equal educational opportunity, academic performance, North Carolina

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review