Cited by 34Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentSchool Choice and PerformanceEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Differential effects of the classroom on african american and non–african american's mathematics achievement

Open access
Schenke, Katerina, Nguyen, Tutrang, Watts, Tyler W., Sarama, Julie, Clements, Douglas H.·2017·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

We examined whether African American students differentially responded to dimensions of the observed classroom-learning environment compared with non-African American students. Further, we examined whether these dimensions of the classroom mediated treatment effects of a preschool mathematics intervention targeted at students from low-income families. Three observed dimensions of the classroom (teacher expectations and developmental appropriateness; teacher confidence and enthusiasm; and support for mathematical discourse) were evaluated in a sample of 1,238 preschool students in 101 classrooms. Using multigroup multilevel mediation where African American students were compared to non-African American students, we found that teachers in the intervention condition had higher ratings on the observed dimensions of the classroom compared with teachers in the control condition. Further, ratings on teacher expectations and developmental appropriateness had larger associations with the achievement of African American students than for non-African Americans. Findings suggest that students within the same classroom may react differently to that learning environment and that classroom learning environments could be structured in ways that are beneficial for students who need the most support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/edu0000165

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 93 · Cited by 34

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Carpenter TP Moser JM 1984 The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three Journal for research in Mathematics Education 179 202
  2. Clarke J Frazer E DiMartino J Fisher P Smith P 2003 Making learning personal: Educational practices that work DiMartino J Clarke J Wolk Personalized learning: Preparing high school students to create their futures 173 194 Lanham, MD Scarecrow Press
  3. Clements DH Sarama J Wolfe CB Spitler ME 2013 Longitudinal evaluation of a scale-up model for teaching mathematics with trajectories and technologies Persistence of effects in the third year American Educational Research Journal 50 4 812 850
  4. Diaz RM 2008 The role of language in early childhood mathematics Doctoral dissertation Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3319002)
  5. Duncan G Magnuson K 2005 Test score gaps: The contributions of family economic and social conditions The Future of Children 15 1 35 54 16130540
  6. Harms T Clifford RM Cryer D 1998 Early childhood environment rating scale Revised Edition New York Teachers College Press
  7. Hu LT Bentler PM 1999 Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 1 1 55
  8. Jackson K Wilson J 2012 Supporting African American students’ learning of mathematics: A problem of practice Urban Education 10.1177/0042085911429083 · DOI
  9. National Research Council 2009 Mathematics in early childhood: Learning paths toward excellence and equity Washington, DC National Academy Press
  10. Reardon SF Robinson JP 2008 Patterns and trends in racial/ethnic and socioeconomic academic achievement gaps Ladd HF Fiske EB Handbook of Research in Education Finance and Policy 497 516 New York Routledge
  11. Steffe L Cobb P 1988 Construction of arithmetical meanings and strategies New York Springer

Authors
Schenke, K., Nguyen, T., Watts, T. W., Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Denver (US)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2017-08
Volume
109
Issue
6
Pages
794-811
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2601809491
Cited by
34
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
8.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Educat (R305A120813, R305K05157, and R305A110188)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
African American students, mathematics achievement, classroom climate, teacher expectations, developmental appropriateness, teacher confidence, mathematical discourse, low-income households, differential treatment effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review