Cited by 56Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentParental Involvement in EducationInfant Development and Preterm Care

School readiness amongst urban Canadian families: risk profiles and family mediation.

Browne, Dillon T., Wade, Mark, Prime, Heather, Jenkins, Jennifer M.·2018·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

There is an ongoing need for literature that identifies the effects of broad contextual risk on school readiness outcomes via family mediating mechanisms. This is especially true amongst diverse and urban samples characterized by variability in immigration history. To address this limitation, family profiles of sociodemographic and contextual risk were identified when children were 2 months of age. Subsequently, their indirect effect on school readiness at 4.5 years was evaluated via family investments and maternal responsivity (N = 501 families). A latent class analysis yielded four distinct family risk profiles: low socioeconomic status (SES) multilevel risk, 12.0% of sample; maternal abuse history, 15.6%; low-SES immigrant risk, 27.7%; and low risk, 44.7%. Path analyses revealed that children in the low-SES multilevel risk and low-SES immigrant risk profiles had the poorest outcomes in all domains and these effects operated equally and indirectly via investments and responsivity. To date, several studies have suggested that sociodemographic risks impact cognitive outcomes primarily via the investment pathway. The present findings suggest that family relations are equally important when operationalized as observed responsive parenting. Furthermore, pathways of influence are similarly operative despite different patterning of adversity for high-risk immigrant and native born families. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/edu0000202

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Socioeconomic disparities are associated with children's language skills as well as parental behaviors such as linguistic input and sensitivity.

    “socioeconomic disparities are associated with children ' s language skills 9,27 as well as parental behaviors such as linguistic input and sensitivity. 28,29”

    From Parenting Behavior and Child Language: A Meta-analysis. (2019) · cites this paper as [29]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 82 · Cited by 56

Authors
Browne, D. T., Wade, M., Prime, H., & Jenkins, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2018-01
Volume
110
Issue
1
Pages
133-146
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2606415160
Cited by
56
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
11.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
school readiness, contextual risk, immigrant families, maternal responsiveness, responsive parenting, household investment, socioeconomic status, early childhood, urban households

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review